|
<br /> Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, that findings supporting
<br /> the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes
<br /> e and minutes of October 19, 1982, be adopted by reference thereto;
<br /> that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br /> only, with unanimous consent of the council; and that enactment
<br /> be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried
<br /> unanimously.
<br /> Council Bill 2580 was read the second time by council bill number only.
<br /> Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, that the bill be approved
<br /> and given final passage. Roll call vote; motion carried 7:1,
<br /> with Councilors Ball, Hamel, Lindberg, Miller, Obie, Schue, and
<br /> Smith voting in favor, and Councilor Wooten voting in opposition.
<br /> The bill was declared passed and numbered 19060.
<br /> D. Revisions to Industrial Zoning District Regulations (CA 82-4) (memo,
<br /> additional information distributed)
<br /> Mr. Gleason introduced Gary Chenkin, Planning. Mr. Chenkin said that there had
<br /> been little controversy regarding this item at the Planning Commission's hearing.
<br /> He referred to the memorandum from the Planning staff that had been included
<br /> with meeting agendas and said that the revisions would bring the City Zoning
<br /> Ordinance into conformance with the Metropolitan Area General Plan. Mr. Chenkin
<br /> said that under the proposed revisions the former M-1 and M-2 industrial districts
<br /> would be replaced by the 1-2 Light Industrial District, and the former M-3
<br /> District would be replaced by the 1-3 Heavy Industrial District. Mr. Chenkin
<br /> noted that the council had previously adopted city-wide performance standards
<br /> e that apply to the industrial districts, that meant that many uses formerly
<br /> listed as conditional in industrial zones no longer needed to be conditional,
<br /> since the performance standards should assure compatability and appropriateness
<br /> of uses. He said that use of performance standards rather than the conditional
<br /> use process should streamline the process of citing new industry. Mr. Chenkin
<br /> said that the ordinance also included added regulations regarding minimal
<br /> standards for provision of bicycle parking and changes in height regulations to
<br /> guarantee protection for solar energy use. He noted that staff had worked
<br /> closely with the Chamber of Commerce Code Committee in developing the proposed
<br /> revisions. Mr. Chenkin said that the Planning Commission had voted unanimously
<br /> to recommend adoption to the council.
<br /> Public hearing, was opened.
<br /> There being no members of the public who wished to speak, public hearing was
<br /> closed.
<br /> CB 2581--An ordinance concerning industrial zoning districts;
<br /> amending sections 7.180, 7.410, 9.268, 9.270, 9.296,
<br /> 9.310, 9.324, 9.338, 9.352, 9.366, 9.380, 9.394, 9.408,
<br /> 9.448, 9.450, 9.452, 9.468, 9.470, 9.472, 9.474, 9.492,
<br /> 9.510, 9.534, 9.540, 9.542, 9.544, 9.546, 9.554, 9.582,
<br /> 9.586, 9.587, 9.593, 9.644, and 9.702 of the Eugene Code,
<br /> 1971; repealing sections 9.462, 9.464, 9.466 of that
<br /> code; adding a new section 9.454 thereto; and declaring
<br /> e an emergency.
<br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 22, 1982 Page 14
<br />
|