Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />to University of Oregon football games. Mr. Sercombe said that annexation of <br />the stadium to the City of Eugene was currently being considered at the planning <br />Commission level and that the university had expressed concern that the tailgating <br />activities be permitted to continue if the annexation takes place. He noted <br />that the ordinance changes would make this possible. Mr. Sercombe said that a <br />number of affected City departments, including the City Attorney's Office, the <br />Police and Planning departments, and the Municipal Court, had reviewed the <br />proposed ordinance changes and had recommended approval to the council. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten asked what statistical information was available on the numbers <br />of automobile accidents or fights that could be attributed to the drinking of <br />hard liquor at tailgating parties. Eugene Police Chief Jim Packard responded <br />that Eugene Police had no record of accidents caused by people driving under the <br />influence of liquor consumed at tailgating events and that problems, such as <br />fistfights, occurring in the stadium would have been handled by the University <br />security police or by the Lane County Sheriff's department, so Eugene Police <br />would not have a record of them. <br /> <br />Councilor Holmer suggested that the time mentioned in the ordinance for tail- <br />gating parties (four hours before and two hours after stadium events) might <br />be excessive. Chief Packard said that the university had suggested this time <br />frame as a result of observations of actual practice. Mayor Keller and several <br />councilors said they believed the suggested time frame was appropriate. <br /> <br />Councilor Lindberg asked for clarification of the extent to which consumption of <br />liquor in City parks is permitted. He said he believed that it was illegal to <br />consume liquor in certain parks, such as West University Park, and asked whether <br />this was specified elsewhere in the City Code. Mr. Sercombe responded affirma- <br />tively. Mr. Lindberg said he understood that the ordinance amendments before <br />the council made an attempt to define "visibly intoxicated" by describing <br />behavior. He wondered if the Police or the City Attorney's Office have some <br />concept in mind of what those terms, such as "loud" behavior mean. Mr. Sercombe <br />said that the proposed language was taken from the State Statute and agreed that <br />interpretation of "loud" could cause legal problems, which would have to be <br />addressed as they occurred. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />There being no public testimony, public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />CB 2593--An ordinance concerning alcohol-related offenses; <br />amending Sections 4.105, 4.110, 4.140, 4.160, 4.165, <br />4.190, 4.125, and 4.990 of the Eugene Code, 1971; <br />repealing Sections 4.220, 4.230, and 4.235 of that code; <br />and declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the <br />second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent <br />of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. <br />Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 9, 1983 <br /> <br />P ag e 5 <br />