Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilor Smith supported Option 1, taking no further action, since she believed <br />that a satisfactory review mechanism was already in place. <br /> <br />Councilor Ball asked if Option 3 represented any substantive change to what was <br />already in place. Mr. Sercombe responded that Option 3 required an annual <br />review of the full four-percent Room Tax allocation by the Room Tax Subcommittee <br />and a recommendation to the council. He said it would then be up to the council <br />whether to place the item on a council agenda. Mr. Gleason added that Option 3 <br />would differ from current practice in that at present the allocation formula is <br />accomplished as a program review during the budget process and Option 3 would <br />provide for a separate council review of the allocation. Mr. Gleason said that <br />if Option 3 were selected, he would also recommend that this review be separate <br />from the program review. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten said that, in the spirit of compromise, she would support <br />Option 3. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, that the council adopt <br />Option 3. Roll call vote; motion failed 3:4, with Councilors <br />Ball, Schue, and Wooten voting in favor, and Councilors Hansen, <br />Holmer, Obie, and Smith voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller stated that, since there were no other motions, the process <br />would remain unchanged. <br /> <br />VI. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT (memo, resolution distributed) <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason introduced Marge Beck, Director of Council and Community Services. <br />Ms. Beck thanked Affirmative Action Task Force Chairperson Ann Bunnenberg for <br />her service to the City on the task force and on the Commission on the Rights of <br />Women. Ms. Beck discussed affirmative action in the City. She said staff <br />shared the concerns raised by the task force and agreed with some, but not all, <br />of the findings and recommendations. She said staff felt it was misleading to <br />say that the City has "no functioning affirmative action program". She noted <br />that the City does have affirmative action employment goals and policies and <br />that, while these may not be as extensive as the task force desires, the City <br />and the task force can work together on them. Ms. Beck agreed that the goals <br />for City departments could be updated and made more specific. She said that the <br />five-year plan under which the City was currently operating had been based on <br />1970 census data and noted that 1980 census data had only been made available <br />this year. <br /> <br />Ms. Beck then discussed selections that had been made in the Executive Manager, <br />Division Manager, and professional area and noted that of 19 division managers <br />in seven of the City departments, 11 were minorities or women, six of them <br />selected within the last two years. She said that the professional staff <br />distrjbution was about even between males and females and noted that in this <br />category 56 percent of the selections made in the past two years were women. <br />Ms. Beck noted that in the past year the City had implemented a training program <br />using internal staff as trainers on specific skills. She said this program was <br />aimed at providing women managers with development experience and providing <br />positive role models for female employees. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 20, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />