12/12/1983 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

areas at D and F condition levels as listed in the project by driving through the neighborhoods. Traffic Engineer Jim Hanks said that the removal of parking e from 11th and 13th avenues would increase the capacity of those streets but would also have significant impact on the area residents. He stated that the widening project was connected to future projects which would not directly link up with 11th and 13th avenues. He said the viability of West 11th Avenue as an industrial and commercial area might decrease because the traffic flow would be lessened'without the proposed widening. Mr. Gleason stressed that the Chambers Street Connector was a key element in the project; the connector would not work without the widening project. Ms. Wooten said it took her approximately four minutes to drive from Blair Boulevard to High Street during peak traffic and that she did not find the congestion irritating. In response to her question on the generation of the traffic projections, Mr. McKinley said that the State had attempted to emulate the Metropolitan Plan by subtracting some of the downtown employement figures from the 1990 Plan and then adding the Willow Creek traffic, dwellings, and employment. Ms. Wooten requested to seek the actual figures generated for the projections. She agreed with the need for the widening project, but questioned if the council was committing itself to all three phases of the project. Mr. Gleason said the entire project was divided into three phases but that the City would be committing itself only to the Washington-to-High-Street phase. He said there would be no monetary committment unless a right-of-way agreement was necessary. He added that the State would not commit money to the project without the extension project. In response to a question, Mr. Hanks explained why repaving the two streets was not a viable alternative. He stated that the repaving project would last approximately 50 years. e In response to a question, Ms. Decker said the widening project would serve the entire city and that staff felt the representatives from the Planning Commission, the Downtown Commission, and the City Council would address the concerns of the entire city. Mr. Genasci questioned the description of 6th and 7th avenues as being utilized for both through traffic and short trips. Mr. Reinhard said the two streets connected the major arterials in the area, but such use did not mean that they were not also used for short trips and for access to the downtown by area residents. Referring to Table 4 in the Environmental Assessment Plan, Mr. Genasci said the solution appeared to be a local adjustment to the streets rather than their widening. Mr. Gleason responded that signing and enforcement would not impact on through traffic, adding that there was no successful alter- native to dealing with the situation of linking the Coast and McKenzie routes. He stressed that the widening of 6th and 7th avenues was a minor project and would stay within the existing right-of-way. He stated that the Metropolitan Plan called for a 30-percent modal split and he wished the City to strive for that level, the present split being 12 percent. He stressed that the volumes of traffic involved must be discussed when dealing with this issue. He recognized that even slow-moving traffic would maintain the traffic levels, but breakdown of the intersections would have a tremendous impact on the neighborhoods. In response to a question, Mr. Hanks said the Oregon standards for construction would require that businesses along the highway construction have continuous access except during those periods when it is absolutely necessary; therefore, e MINUTES--Eugene City Council Dinner Session December 12, 1983 Page 6