Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />VII. REVIEW OF WEATHERIZATION ORDINANCE (memo, ordinance, background information <br />distributed) <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Greg Page, Project <br />Manager for Facilities Development, gave the staff report, reviewing the purpose <br />of the weatherization ordinance passed in 1981 that established specific standards <br />for existing residential dwellings for use in times of energy shortages. The <br />intent was to improve the performance of voluntary programs of utilities, and <br />inform the community of expectations during energy shortages. The review today <br />is scheduled because the council required a review one year in advance of <br />implementation of weatherization standards. Over the last three years, there <br />has been a surplus in the supply of energy; prices have increased about 10 <br />percent per year. Mr. Page felt that the surplus in supply was a temporary <br />condition. <br /> <br />Matt Northway, Conservation Manager of Eugene Water and Electric Board, then <br />reported on the success of the voluntary program, stating that about 12 percent <br />of the electrically-heated homes served by EWEB have been weatherized, and 60 <br />percent of electric water heaters have been insulation-wrapped. This represents <br />over $6.5 million in customer reimbursements, with a potential energy savings of <br />34 million KWH per year. EWEB has had 34 percent of its customers request <br />energy audits since inception of the financing program. At Bonnevillels current <br />funding level, it would take from five to seven years to weatherize all homes <br />requesting it. Even with the sale of weatherization bonds, it will take two <br />years to weatherize those on the waiting list. Even though we are in an <br />energy surplus stage, lower costs realized by weatherization can be passed on to <br />EWEBls customers. EWEB will continue to work with the council to ensure commit- <br />ment to energy conservation. <br /> <br />Mr. Page listed three options on the ordinance for council action, as: 1) <br />enactment in 1985; 2) postponement; and 3) abolishment. He stated that the <br />staff recommends adoption of option #2, postponement, because there is a sub- <br />stantial amount of work to be done--75 to 80 percent of the population still <br />needs weatherization. <br /> <br />In response to Councilor Ball IS question on why postponement for two years was <br />not recommended, Mr. Page said that the reason was that, .from all indications, <br />the energy surplus would last for at least two years. While this was the major <br />reason, availability of financing was also a factor. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller asked for clarification on the backlog of 42 percent of the homes, <br />and if this percent of customers would be served if the bond measure was passed. <br />Mr. Northway responded that passing the bond measure would be a help to these <br />customers. In response to Mayor Keller's second question, Mr. Northway felt <br />that a five-year extension of the ordinance would help penetrate a broader <br />segment of the community. <br /> <br />Councilor Hansen asked that if, under the present program, there was any assist- <br />ance for those who do not have an "all-electric" home. Mr. Page responded that <br />it is estimated that there are 7,000 natural gas and oil customers and that <br />there are 6-1/2 percent loan programs available to assist them weatherize. Mr. <br />Gleason added that partial electric customers have been provided with water <br />tank wraps by EWEB. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 11, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />