Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten said that a postponement of this matter would not reflect a <br />backing away from a commitment for weatherization. Regardless of energy supply, <br />we are going to have to move forward with a successful program and develop other <br />means to assist homeowners with weatherization for all types of heat. <br /> <br />Councilor Schue underscored Councilor Wooten1s comments in commitment to this <br />project. She added that a change in circumstances is causing postponement of <br />the final date rather than a loss of interest in the project. <br /> <br />Councilor Ball interjected that he was less than optimistic because 42 percent <br />of the citizens, in a three-year period, have responded to the weatherization <br />program, leaving 58 percent that have not. He hoped that council would not <br />redesign the ordinance to accommodate the vagaries of the immediate situation. <br />With that caution, he would support the delay. <br /> <br />Councilor Schue responded to Councilor Ball that she disagreed with his inter- <br />pretation of the statistics in that there are people who have weatherized on <br />their own and some other circumstances that should be considered. Councilor <br />Ball then said that the question to be raised in the priority of the ordinance <br />is -- is it to put financing in place, or to make sure an ordinance is in place <br />that requires weatherization. Mayor Keller agreed with Councilor Ball that <br />priorities need to be considered, but that a 42-percent interest rate was <br />significant in view of the minimum community support of the council and EWEB's <br />objectives in the beginning. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CB 2711--An ordinance concerning weatherization standards for <br />residential homes; amending Ordinance No. 18757; creating <br />new review and effective dates; and declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be read <br />the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous <br />consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this <br />time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />Council Bill 2711 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved <br />and given final passage. all councilors present voting aye, the <br />bill was declared passed (and became Ordinance No. 19213). <br /> <br />VIII. FLOW-DEPENDENT RATE FOR RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE (memo, background <br />information distributed) <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Bill Guenzler, Public <br />Works Maintenance Engineer, presented the staff report. He said that the Metro- <br />politan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC), consultants, and staff have <br />studied this issue since 1980, and have made maximum use of the data. There is <br />a divergence of opinion on the flow-dependent concept being extended to residen- <br />tial service users. Springfield City Council have informally concluded that the <br />current flat rate should be used for residential customers. They will make a <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 11, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />