Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />paying any type of tax. He suggested that this issue be addressed to Springfield <br />and Lane County. The other members of the council indicated their support for <br />this suggestion. Mr. Ball asked how integral the vaccination program is to the <br />success of the Spay/Neuter Program. He felt that the vaccinations were only <br />providing income for the other program. He questioned the need for vaccination <br />for distemper and parvo because of the little danger to human health. He also <br />stated that leptospirosis was also not clearly related to dog-human relationships. <br />He cited figures from the State Health Division which indicate that none of the <br />reported leptospirosis cases can be attributed to canines. He said that these <br />vaccinations should be studied. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen stated that he has been encouraging a review of this issue. He said <br />other veterinarians have indicated their willingness to provide a low-cost <br />spay/neuter clinic rather than having the City provide the service. He said <br />they are also concerned with the City being in the vaccination 'business and he <br />recognized that the 37,000 vaccinations administered does have an economic <br />impact on those veterinarians. He suggested that a committee be formed to: <br />ensure that low-cost spay/neuter fees through the veterinarians are provided, <br />set up a program to ensure that animals are licensed) and set up a vaccination <br />program. Mr. Hansen said the City should get out of the spay/neuter and vac- <br />cination business if it can be shown that the veterinarians can provide the same <br />services at a reasonable cost. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said she agreed with Mr. Ball to study the vaccination program; she <br />disagreed with ~Ir. Hansen's first two points. She said she is satisfied with <br />the present system, stressing that it is cost-effective and providing a public <br />service. In addition, she said that no determination has been made of the real <br />impact on the private veterinary clinics. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue stated that she is willing to study the issue. She said the Spay/Neuter <br />Clinic was initiated because community needs were not being met by the private <br />veterinarians. She said that no private veterinarian can be expected to operate <br />only to cover costs as the City is doing. She said it would be short-sighted to <br />eliminate the program after it has proven so successful. She asked staff to <br />forward a copy of the report to Jack Delay, the person most responsible for the <br />program. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen agreed that it was Mr. Delay's program and commented it was sold on <br />an emotional basis. He stressed that if the private veterinarians can assure <br />low-cost spay/neuter surgery, then the City should not be in that business. He <br />acknowledged that the City should stay in the business if no controls can be <br />provided. He said it is time to restudy the program. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith said that Mr. Hansen's suggestion should be studied and be brought <br />back to the council at a later date. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the Mayor appoint two <br />councilors to reassess the approach on the Spay/Neuter Clinic <br />program and to present the result of that study to the council. <br /> <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 25, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />