Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />restoration. He <br />in the forecast. <br />long stated that <br />40 FTE. <br /> <br />recommended adopting the service restoration budget outlined <br />In response to a question, Director of Staff Services Gary <br />this restoration would mean an increase of approximately <br /> <br />Mr. Wong then began his review of the 19 assumptions as outlined in his <br />April 6, 1984, memorandum to the City Council. The following statements <br />reflect the discussion held in relation to the 19 assumptions. <br /> <br />A. froperty Taxes--Current <br /> <br />Mr. Wong stated that the figures presented were the best estimate of the <br />assessor prior to the February collections and assumed a collection rate <br />increasing to 88 percent as of FY90. Mr. Gleason added that any future <br />annexations to the City will be a net wash. In response to a question, <br />Mr. Gleason stated that speeding up the collection process would require a <br />change in State law. He reviewed the levy process; he added that he felt the <br />people would not vote to pay their taxes prior to when the State levies its <br />rates. The councilors discussed the options of changing the penalty process <br />to address those individuals who do not pay their taxes and moving the tax <br />collection date from November to October. Another suggestion raised was <br />changing the City's fiscal year to coincide with that of the Federal govern- <br />ment. Mayor Keller stated that any return to the previous lifestyle of people <br />moving every seven years would force individuals to pay their taxes. Mr. Wong <br />stated that staff was currently working with the 8S-percent collection rate, <br />adding that delinquent taxes were increasing significantly. It was the <br />consensus of the council to adopt the rate as outlined. <br /> <br />B. froperty Taxes--Prior Years <br /> <br />Mr. Wong stated that the collection rate was averaging 38 percent, with staff <br />expecting the rate to increase to 45 percent by FY90. He said that staff <br />usually saw delinquent taxes being paid off by one-third each year under good <br />economic conditions. In response to a question, Mr. Wong explained that the <br />15 percent rate of the current levy going delinquent each year would result in <br />a total of delinquent taxes averaging one-third. Mr. Gleason added that this <br />assumed a payment of approximately 85 percent of the current taxes and one- <br />third of the delinquent taxes. He stated that property assessments were <br />currently stable. Consensus was reached on the proposed rates. <br /> <br />Mr. Ball entered the meeting at this time. <br /> <br />C. In-lieu-of Taxes--EWEB Trojan/Electric <br /> <br />Mr. Wong stated that the proposed rates assumed a rate increase and a growth <br />factor in terms of consumption. Mr. Gleason stated that the proposal did not <br />resolve the outstanding Trojan issue. In response to a question, Mr. Wong <br />stated that the rates listed were based on the price increase per unit and the <br />growth factor. Mr. Gleason stated that the growth rates had not been as high as <br />expected. While Ms. Wooten said the need to use Trojan was lower than expected, <br />Mr. Gleason added that not using Plants 1 and 2 might place the utilities in a <br />deficit position. Ms. Wooten felt the figures were optimistic given other <br />factors. Mr. Holmer suggested a rate of one or two percent above the inflation <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 11, 1984 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />