Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e Allen Johnson, 915 Oak, represented the applicant. He had been told the <br /> council would consider only the existing record, although it seemed to him <br /> other things had been discussed. He asked those present who represented <br /> Looking Glass to stand. About 25 people stood. Mr. Johnson said they had <br /> been at the Planning Commission hearing but had not been permitted to test- <br /> ify in favor of the request. <br /> Mr. Johnson pointed out the council could modify the decision of the Plan- <br /> ning Commission or add conditions to the council's recommendation to the <br /> Boundary Commission. Plans called for an access easement across Tax Lot <br /> 2800 to 43rd Avenue to Dillard Road. The earnest money agreement with the <br /> owner of Tax Lot 700 included an agreement to provide the easement. How- <br /> ever, Mr. Johnson understood an offer had been made on Tax Lot 2800 and that <br /> complicated the access problem. He pointed out access is not one of the <br /> criteria for annexation. Many large properties have been annexed without <br /> access to the whole parcel. Access becomes an issue when a specific use is <br /> identified in a conditional use permit request. Urban levels of service in <br /> the Metro Plan mean roads that lead to the site. The zoning requested would <br /> permit only a single-family dwelling and access to one house exists. <br /> Referring to access via 43rd Avenue, Mr. Johnson said the issue was first <br /> raised in a memo submitted by Mr. Farthing to Mr. Croteau on Friday, <br /> December 7, 1984. It was not a proper subject of the appeal because it was <br /> not raised at the commission hearing. Mr. Johnson was prepared to introduce <br /> evidence of dedicated public right of way along 43rd Avenue through the <br /> Sweetbriar Subdivision. <br /> e Discussing services and facilities, Mr. Johnson said the requested City zone <br /> is the same as the existing County zone. Annexation was requested because <br /> urban services are available to Tax Lot 700 which is adjacent to the city <br /> limits and a City sewer. The council should decide whether the City will <br /> offer services to Tax Lot 700. There is a storm sewer plan. There are pub- <br /> lic roads, schools, electricity, and fire protection. Annexation would <br /> extend those services. The city limits are on the north and west borders of <br /> Tax Lot 700. A logical boundary will result. Past annexations have had <br /> private access to the site over land in the county. The adopted portion of <br /> the South Hills Study requires that PUD considerations, soil and drainage <br /> considerations, and sidewalks be dealt with when a specific use is pro- <br /> posed. They are not appropriate subjects in an annexation hearing. <br /> Mr. Johnson said the question of need is addressed by the designation in the <br /> Metro Plan which is a legislative decision. He referred to a legislative <br /> overlay to comprehensive plans (ORS 197 752) which ensures that compre- <br /> hensive plans will be implementated inside the urban growth boundaries. <br /> Mr. Johnson had submitted supplemental findings to Mr. Croteau. He asked <br /> the council to interpret the relationship of the Metro Plan, the South Hills <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 10, 1984 Page 6 <br />