Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />RESOLUTION <br /> <br />A Resolution Accepting Measures Taken <br />To Correct Deficiencies Disclosed in <br />The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for <br />The Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1984 <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: <br /> <br />The firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. has completed the audit of the <br />financial records of the City of Eugene for the fiscal year ending June 30, <br />1984, as required by ORS 297.425 and, pursuant to ORS 297.465, reported to the <br />Mayor and City Council on its findings. <br /> <br />The report advised the Mayor and City Council of certain deficiencies in <br />the financial records of the City. <br /> <br />ORS 297.466 requires that the City Council adopt a resolution setting <br />forth measures to correct the deficiencies noted in the audit report and the <br />period of time estimated to implement and complete these corrective measures. <br /> <br />Now, Therefore <br /> <br />Be it Resolved By The City Council of the City of Eugene, a Municipal <br />Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows: <br /> <br />Section 1. The audit report stated that the City made expenditures <br />in excess of the amount appropriated on a fund and department basis. <br />Sp~cifi ca lly: <br /> <br />1. Overexpenditure of $16,655 in the Library Trust Fund due to <br />misbudgeted capital project expenditures for a computer upgrade. <br /> <br />2. Overexpenditure of $2,143 in the Municipal Airport Fund due to <br />departmental operating expenditures in excess of budget for Fire <br />Department activities at the airport. <br /> <br />The Finance Division has been monitoring budget compliance on an <br />ongoing basis. This monitoring activity provides a reasonably prudent control <br />eliminating such overexpenditures to as great an extent as possible, and <br />and as such provides an appropriate corrective measure. <br /> <br />Section 2. The audit report stated that throughout the year there were <br />several funds that operated in a cash deficit position and that these defi- <br />cits in substance, represent unauthorized interfund loans. Cash deficit <br />positions result during the first several months of the fiscal year since <br />it is not possible to record the ending cash balance as of the prior year <br />end until the audit is completed for the prior year. These deficits are <br />therefore created by a system restriction and do not necessarily reflect a <br />true deficit. Specifically, the cash deficit at June 30, 1984 of $192,720 <br />for CETA/JTPA Fund and $30,166 for the Municipal Airport Fund results from <br />the "reimbursement basis" of the grant revenue sources in those funds. The <br />CETA/JTPA reimbursement for June 84 activity was received in the first week <br />