Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />May 22, 1985 <br /> <br />TO: Eugene City Council <br />FROM: Eugene Development Department <br /> <br />SUBJECT: SIDEWALK VENDING OPTIONS <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />At a Public Hearing on Sidewalk Vending held on April 22, 1985, you requested <br />that we prepare a report on vari ous aspects of the proposed ordi nance and <br />rules on sidewalk vending. Following is a summary of staff research on these <br />issues. <br /> <br />Grandfather Clause <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The primary purpose of the public streets and sidewalks is for use by <br />vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The intersection at 13th and Kincaid <br />supports a high volume of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic, <br />including LTD buses that pick up and discharge passengers twelve times an hour <br />throughout the day. During the past year, we nave observed the intersection <br />at peak traffic times. Given our observations, a grandfather clause <br />permitting the current location of sidewalk vendors at 13th and Kincaid would <br />not adequately address our concerns about congestion and public safety at that <br />intersecton. <br /> <br />The City assumes significant liability when it authorizes activities in the <br />public right-of-way. The question of liability is serious and has caused some <br />cities to require sidewalk vendors to be insured for public liability in the <br />amount of one million dollars. Additionally, cities exercise discretionary <br />judgment that places public safety considerations above grandfather issues. <br />In no case where a city adopted a grandfather clause, did there exist a <br />congestion situation comparable to that at 13th and Kincaid. <br /> <br />Initial Allocation of Vendor Locations <br /> <br />We have asked the attorney IS offi ce to determi ne whether our process for <br />initially allocating vendor locations is restricted by any constitutionally <br />protected property right of presently licensed vendors. <br /> <br />The short answer is IInoll. Vendors have no property interest in doing business <br />at any particular location. We may use a seniority or lottery system to <br />assign the vending locations. We may also auction off the prime locations by <br />issuing a separate license to use the City property for vending purposes. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />If the City wishes to auction the prime vendor locations to the highest <br />bidder, this could be accomplished by auctioning a revocable license or permit <br />to the City property in accordance with the terms of the vendors license. A <br />license to use land is a privilege and gives the holder no interest in the <br />oroperty used. <br />