Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br /> <br />. MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />- <br />September 16, 1985 <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Eugene Development Department <br />SUBJECT: ELIMINATION OF DDD PROFESSIONAL TAX <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Through this year1s budget process, the Downtown Commission recommended the <br />elimination of the professional tax from the Downtown Development District <br />revenue base. The reduced revenue is to be offset by a voluntary reduction in <br />the Eugene Downtown Association contract. That recommendation was included in <br />the City Manager's budget proposal and was adopted by the City Budget Committee <br />and the City Council in June. This change to the tax requires an amendment to <br />the Eugene City Code. <br /> <br />The Downtown Parking Program was adopted in 1973. It has been supported by <br />three taxes: an ad valorem tax, a gross receipts tax, and a tax on <br />professionals. The ad valorem tax-a-ssesse.s all property within the Downtown <br />Development District, the gross receipts tax assesses all retail sales within <br />the district, and the professional tax assesses each professional employed _ <br />within the district. The public hearings before the City Council prior to ~ <br />adoption of the program show that there was substantial opposition to the <br />professional tax at that time. <br /> <br />Evaluation <br /> <br />Opposition to the professional tax continued, and it is perceived as unfair <br />and detrimental to further development of the downtown as a professional <br />office center. This situation threatens the goal of developing d6~ntown as a <br />balanced retail, services, housing, and cultural center. <br /> <br />In the background data, the Downtown Plan notes that the IIprofessional tax is <br />difficult to administer and understand because of the definition of <br />Iprofessional. III The pian text calls for an evaluation of the effect of the <br />tax structure on existing uses and future deveiooment, and a cnange to the tax <br />structure to be lIimplemented during the following buaget year.lI (Strategy <br />6,2, page 28.) Following that. the plan suggests a restructuring of the free <br />parking program to reflect changes in land use and parking patterns. <br /> <br />In evaluating and amending the tax structure, the Downtown Commission Degan <br />with the Droressional tax. The Eugene Downtown Association supports the <br />change, stating that the free parking is most critical for the retail <br />community. An increase in professional office development aowntown is in the <br />long-term interest of retail development. An inc~ease in office aeveiopment <br />will create an increase in the retail customer base. The resultina sales ~ <br />growth will enhance the ODD revenues through the qross receipts tax. Members ~ <br />of the rea! estate inaustry advised tne commission that the professional <br />tax was widely held to be unfair and that it had become so significant <br />a fac~or tha~ it influenced the decisions or professionai firms to establish <br />or relocate outside the district, Brokers stated that property in the district <br />suffers a competitive disadvantage with similar sites outside the ODD, <br />