Laserfiche WebLink
seeing. Examples include lots that have already been platted for single-family housing or smaller <br />lots within existing single-family areas. The City Council directed staff to exempt sites less than <br />0.5 acre from the new density requirement. The buildable lands inventory was queried and <br />identified 31 acres that are Medium Density Residential and less than 0.5 acres. As shown in <br />Table 3, the additional capacity from the increased density is reduced to 566 dwellings when the <br />new density is applied only to lots 0.5 acres or greater. This results in about 48 medium density <br />dwellings (or 4.8 acres) remaining. <br />Table 3. Additional Capacity of Vacant and Partially Vacant Medium Density Residential <br />Land 0.5 acres or Larger in Size, City-wide in dwellings <br />New Capacity <br />Capacity under <br />current density <br />Capacity under new <br />density <br />New <br />Acres <br />Acres <br />Created (all <br />of BLI DU/ <br />of BLI DU/ <br />Difference <br />Capacity Unmet <br />sizes) <br />< .5 ac Ac Du <br />< .5 ac Ac Du <br />in Capacity <br />> .5 ac need Deficit <br />41 <br />15. <br />628 <br />1 31 13.4 5 <br />31 4 477 <br />62 <br />566 614 -48 <br />DU = dwelling, AC = acre <br />Therefore, even with exempting Medium Density Residential lots less than 0.5 acres from the <br />new density requirement, the remaining medium density need would be almost entirely met. <br />In order to facilitate the increase in average density to 15.4, the R-2 zone must be amended. The <br />minimum density would need to be 12.8 but because the Eugene Land Use Code Chapter 9 <br />provides minimum and maximum densities based on whole numbers rather than fractions of <br />numbers, the City proposes a minimum density of 13. This would address the small amount of <br />remaining need (48 dwellings). <br />Other considerations <br />Although 15.4 dwellings per net acre is already within the allowable density of R-2 zoning (10-28 <br />dwellings per net acre), the City considered whether the remaining land supply is too <br />constrained to support this change and whether there are examples of R-2 subdivisions already <br />meeting this density. Review of the MDR vacant and partially vacant land supply indicates that <br />most of the supply (82%) is on land with less than 5% slope. The next highest slope category is <br />10-15% slope, at 13% of the supply. Therefore, the slopes of the MDR land in the buildable lands <br />inventory do not initially appear to be a limiting factor for requiring single-family detached <br />housing to be developed at a higher density. <br />Review of R-2 zoned subdivision plats found that about half of the plats approved from 2001- <br />2014 would need to add a significant amount of additional units to meet the targeted net <br />density for single-family detached development. The other plats either already meet the target <br />net density, would need to increase the number of lots by less than 15%, or were part of a <br />planned unit development which allows for more flexibility in meeting development standards. <br />Timing: Amendments to the R-2 Medium Density Zoning Code are proposed with the adoption <br />of this Residential Land Supply Study. <br />Residential Land Supply Study I Final Part IV — Page 8 <br />