My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/22/1991 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1991
>
07/22/1991 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:22:55 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:59:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/22/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e ill, etc. She said this kind of confusion about purpose could occur during <br /> meetings on Eugene Decisions. <br /> Mr. Green said it was his assumption that the council was seeking the advice <br /> of the public, but that it must make the final decisions. He said the coun- <br /> cil would need to exercise discipline in order to "stay the coursen with <br /> Eugene Decisions. He said it would be best if the council could reach con- <br /> sensus on its decisions. <br /> Mayor Miller said the council would use the advice of the public to provide <br /> direction for its decisions. He said any budgetary cuts would require coun- <br /> cil consensus. He said the Mayor's Task Force on Human Rights had reached an <br /> impasse in its decision-making process at which point the majority asked the <br /> minority what concessions were required to reach consensus. He suggested the <br /> council might need to use a similar process with Eugene Decisions. He said <br /> council consensus would help create leadership. <br /> Ms. Ehrman said information disseminated to the public prior to Eugene Deci- <br /> sions was essential in helping the public understand what was at stake and <br /> what the City needed from citizens. <br /> Mr. Nicholson said that when Eugene Decisions was over, the public should <br /> feel that it had been part of a sincere consultation. <br /> Mr. Robinette said he was glad that the workshops were about to begin. He <br /> said the Eugene Decisions process would make better sense to everyone after <br />e the City had collected results from the citizenry. He said citizen surveys <br /> would show whether the public understood the overall process. <br /> Mr. Green said public education was important and noted that there would be <br /> many different levels of understanding. Ms. Bascom said it might be neces- <br /> sary to alter the process if the first methods did not seem to be working. <br /> She pointed out that alterations to the original process might be perceived <br /> by the public as manipulation. <br /> Mr. Nicholson pointed out that the public consensus might be onerous to the <br /> council. Mr. Gleason said the most likely outcome was that the public would <br /> say that it wanted to keep all City services, but did not want to pay for <br /> them. He said staff would collect workshop data and other information, and <br /> create strategies from this material by the end of September. <br /> Mr. Gleason said it could be anticipated that public interest in the Eugene <br /> Decisions process would become intense when strategies were released. <br /> Mr. Robinette said the biggest problem for the council and the City was to <br /> educate the public about the reality of the City's finances. He said that if <br /> this education were successful, the Eugene Decisions process had a chance of <br /> being successful. He noted that staff would create strategies and the coun- <br /> cil would refine these strategies. <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 22, 1991 Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.