01/22/1992 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ Metro Partnership Contract 1. Maintain current level (JM) 2. Eliminate service Downtown Development 1. Eliminate G.F. services except parking (KR) 2. Replace G.F. contribu- tion (SB) 3. Explore possibility of incubating new business (BG) 4. Eliminate G.F. contribution (SB) ~ 5. Reduce service to staffing Downtown Commission Metro Area Planning 1. Reduce to mandated level (RR) 2. Maintain current service level (S8) e 1. Create and sustain jobs (JM) 1. Targeted metro area revenue stream--savings to G.F. (JM) 2. Questionable effective- 2. Eliminate City contribution ness 1. Limited success in present economy (KR) 2. Compact urban growth; vital downtown, RTF #4 (S8) 3. Uniqueness to downtown (8G) 4. Limited success in present economy (S8) 5. Value doesn't justify cost, function isn't one for City to perform 1. That's all that's needed (RR) 2. Vitally important for compact urban growth (S8) MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 22, 1992 1. Parking become self-support- ing and no other charge on G.F. (KR) 2. Differential tax structure on outlying properties (SB) 3. New revenue sources, target S80 loans to this (BG) 4a. A new urban renewal district for "real downtownll to facilitate parking only (JM) b. Spin off C.C. responsibil- ity for urban renewal authority for a downtown development renewal agency c. Sell off property; shut down district (PN) d. Attempt to facilitate the development of a private corp. take over responsibilities currently done by City. 5. Place City URA properties on market with deed restric- tions, eliminate all but park- ing program 1. As needed to get to #1 (RR) 2. Maintain current funding level, expect 60% support from Page 6