My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/1992 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1992
>
01/22/1992 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:28:07 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:02:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/22/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />3. Reduce current level (RB) 3. Use resources effec- <br />tively (RB) <br /> <br />Building Permits/Plan Checking <br /> <br />1. Lower service level (KR) 1. Present service level <br />is less important economi- <br />cally than the proposed <br />increase in cost (KR) <br /> <br />2. Reduce services to <br />critical life safety issues <br />("red issuesll) and only <br />aesthetic quality (SB, RB) <br /> <br />3. Enhanced service level-- <br />no G.F. revenue, 10-days <br />residential, 3 weeks commer- <br />cial. Create development and <br />planning committee to oversee <br />implementation of PIC (JM) <br /> <br />4. Retain service level, <br />_ coordinate Planning and <br />~ other departments essential <br />activities <br /> <br />5. Retain current service <br />level (RR) <br /> <br />6. Retain current service <br />level with no public <br />support (RR) <br /> <br />7. Enhance service level at <br />lower cost (PN) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2. We've become over- <br />codified (SB) <br /> <br />3. High standard <br />of quality (JM) <br /> <br />4. Significant to economic <br />development <br /> <br />5. Coordination with Plan- <br />ning is essential; timeli- <br />ness has significant <br />economic impact (RR) <br /> <br />6. High quality service <br />at a decrease in public <br />costs (RR) <br /> <br />7. Current system <br />ineffective, widely <br />evaded (PN) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 22, 1992 <br /> <br />State Government--Reduce City's <br />expenditures by 60% (SB) <br /> <br />3. Work with Springfield and <br />Lane County--coordination (RB) <br /> <br />1. Contract--privatize; relin- <br />quish to County/State (KR) <br /> <br />2. Establish a set of Eugene <br />standards using BCAC for <br />guidance (SB) <br /> <br />3. Support with revenues and <br />fees of business community (JM) <br /> <br />4. Increase fees to offset G.F. <br />costs; allow lower service level <br />acknowledge lower service level <br />is acceptable, service level <br />less important than cost, lower <br />fee increase (but increase to <br />100% recovery); contract with <br />another agency; get City out of <br />service provision <br /> <br />5. Adopt council policy of <br />total cost recovery in 5 years-- <br />20% step, cost recovery in 3 <br />years (RR) <br /> <br />6. Offer variable pricing based <br />on turnaround time and whether <br />prepared by architect/engineer; <br />only accept complete set of <br />plans prepared by architect/ <br />engineer (RR) <br /> <br />7. Minor permitting automated <br />with random inspections, reduce <br />permit granting function--by <br />phone (PN) <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.