Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Candace Syman-Degler, 1090 Brookside Drive, said she came home one day to <br />find that the forest behind her house had disappeared. She said she assumed <br />that as many trees as possible would have been preserved in the development <br />of the property behind her house. She urged the council to adopt a mandatory <br />approach to preserving trees. <br /> <br />Mary Johnson, 1010 Brookside Drive, testified in support of a mandatory ap- <br />proach to preserving trees. She said she lives in an area that is presently <br />undergoing rapid residential development. <br /> <br />Bob Tate, 3130 Willakenzie Road, testified in support of a voluntary approach <br />to preserving trees. <br /> <br />Bob Fauvre, 2979 Maranta Street, testified in support of a voluntary approach <br />for preserving trees. <br /> <br />Jeannie Loe, 2857 Greentree Way, said she was appalled after reading about <br />the costs in administering a mandatory tree preservation program, which she <br />said would not serve the needs of the community. She said she did not think <br />trees in Eugene were endangered and urged the council to adopt a voluntary <br />approach to preserving trees. <br /> <br />Fred Lockhart, 39705 Little Fall Creek Road, Tree Commission member, said the <br />UFMP is a comprehensive set of policies, of which the intent is to protect <br />Eugene's urban forest. He said the UFMP seeks to establish the ground work <br />for drafting new, workable, and effective tree ordinances. He said he felt <br />confident that the citizen-involvement process would allow concerns to be <br />expressed during the development of these ordinances. He said he shares <br />concerns of the building community about adding bureaucratic red tape. He <br />said it is important to take into account that the UFMP policies can be im- <br />plemented over time and that costs of implementing new ordinances will re- <br />place the cost of enforcing the current inefficient tree ordinance. <br /> <br />Paul Gilbertson, 1312 Lincoln Street, testified in support of a voluntary <br />approach to preserving trees. <br /> <br />Chester Pietka, 1330 Lincoln Street, testified in support of a voluntary <br />approach to preserving trees. He said he shared concerns already expressed <br />about costs. He suggested providing an incentive for planting trees, such as <br />reducing the cost of building permits. He also suggested encouraging the <br />planting of trees that emit relatively less pollen. <br /> <br />John VanLandingham, 335 North Grand Street, testified in opposition to a <br />mandatory approach to preserving trees. He said the UFMP exempts single-fam- <br />ily development, which he said comprises most residential development. He <br />felt this singled out multi-family development and affordable housing. He <br />said any added costs in housing development will increase the cost of afford- <br />able housing development. He said the City has not succeeded in recovering <br />the full cost of administering structural codes. He expressed concern about <br />making it more difficult in meeting density goals. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />7:30 <br /> <br />April 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />