Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Nancy Lochner, 1965 Charnel ton Street, testified in support of a voluntary <br />approach for reasons which she said have already been stated. <br /> <br />Tom Slocum, 1950 Graham Drive, testified in support of a voluntary approach <br />in preserving trees and expressed concern about the cost of administering a <br />mandatory tree protection program. <br /> <br />Tom Wester, 3495 Honeywood Street, testified in support of a voluntary ap- <br />proach to preserving trees. <br /> <br />Jim Breeden, 366 East 40th Avenue, said suggestions made by him and the <br />Homebuilders Association have been ignored and that such suggestions were <br />made to reduce housing costs. He expressed concern about added difficulty <br />and costs that discourage growth and development. He quoted Councilor Boles <br />from a recent interview with The Register-Guard about possibly compensating <br />property owners and asked how compensation could be of more importance than <br />increasing City revenues and the city's tax base. <br /> <br />Bruce Bergby, 3357 Videra Drive, Tree Commission member, asked about concerns <br />regarding the costs, solar access requirements, and fire prevention relative <br />to tree preservation. <br /> <br />Robert Conrad, 3960 Dillard Road, suggested implementing a voluntary tree <br />preservation program with existing resources. He said as an advocate for low- <br />and moderate-income homeowners, he is opposed to any added costs to develop- <br />ing affordable housing, unless they are for health or safety issues. He <br />suggested using the resources to develop a revolving construction-loan fund <br />to be used for developing affordable housing. <br /> <br />John Carliss, 2998 Washington Street, introduced himself as a retiree of the <br />Forest Service who specialized in land use planning. He felt policies were <br />needed regarding fire prevention, solar access and tree height requirements, <br />and the protection of trees within riparian zones. He also felt that the <br />proposed ordinances should be prioritized and that heritage trees should be <br />identified as a public resource. <br /> <br />Randy Prince, PO Box 927, said he felt Eugene's urban forest has diminished <br />in the last decade under existing regulations. He asked the council to keep <br />in mind concerns regarding the maintenance of heritage trees on property that <br />is not owner-occupied. He described tree preservation programs using volun- <br />teer organizations that have been used in other cities. <br /> <br />Gretchen Pierce, 31434 Fox Hollow Road, President of the Eugene Area Chamber <br />of Commerce, said she supports the effort to preserve heritage trees, noting <br />that she is a property owner of at least one, and possibly two, heritage <br />trees. She said the definition of heritage tree in the UFMP was unclear. <br />She suggested conducting an inventory of all heritage trees within city lim- <br />its, followed by public hearings on the inventory and providing an appeal <br />process for property owners. She said that the question of whether to have <br />mandatory or voluntary compliance may then be moot. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />7:30 <br /> <br />April 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />