Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Robert Murray, 2650 Bowmont Drive, testified in opposition to a mandatory <br />approach of preserving trees on private property. He said the existing tree <br />ordinance requires that a permit be obtained to cut more than five trees in a <br />calendar year. He supported encouraging the retention of heritage trees. <br /> <br />Dennis Casady, PO Box 5028, said that 80 percent of respondents polled in a <br />survey were opposed to a mandatory approach to preserving trees in Eugene. <br />He said the City lacks the revenue to administer the plan. He urged the <br />adoption of the voluntary approach for polices 12 and 17, as recommended by <br />the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Micheal Roberts, 1919 Myers Road, Building Construction Advisory Committee <br />(BCAC) member and BCAC Task Team member, noted the difference between the <br />costs to administer the plan estimated by the City and the Homebuilders Asso- <br />ciation. He discussed the results of a study recently conducted on the Gen- <br />eral Fund costs of operating the Building Division. In conclusion, he asked <br />the council to support the Planning Commission's recommendations. <br /> <br />Bob Moulton, 294 Sterling Drive, Eugene Chamber Task Force member, testified <br />in support of a voluntary approach to preserving trees and for the Planning <br />Commission's recommendations on policies 12 and 17. He suggested taking a <br />positive approach by encouraging the planting of trees. <br /> <br />Dan Hall, 1702 Karyl Street, testified in support of a voluntary approach to <br />preserving trees. He said he is a builder and owns lots in the south hills <br />and noted that he would expect some compensation if he was unable to develop <br />his lots because of mandatory tree protection policies. He emphasized that <br />builders are voluntarily planting trees. <br /> <br />Sara leiman, 26240 Cherry Creek Road, said her family owns undeveloped prop- <br />erty in the south hills and expressed support for the Planning Commission's <br />recommendations. She suggested balancing the need to be flexible in develop- <br />ing property with the need to protect the City's natural resources. <br /> <br />Dave Hauser, 2904 Wolf Meadows Lane, representing the Chamber of Commerce, <br />said the Chamber of Commerce feels that the preservation of trees is suffi- <br />ciently provided under existing ordinances and has expressed concern regard- <br />ing the cost of administering a mandatory approach in previous public hear- <br />ings. He testified in support of a voluntary approach, saying that it would <br />provide increased emphasis on the preservation of trees through education <br />while incorporating fleXibility the developers need to take advantage of <br />economic opportunities and serve consumers. <br /> <br />Bob Schafer, 86092 lorane Highway, testified in support of a voluntary ap- <br />proach to preserving trees. He expressed concern about potential added costs <br />for developing housing. <br /> <br />Allen DeGeneault, 2943 Wolf Meadows Lane, said he was opposed to a mandatory <br />approach to preserving trees on private property. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />7:30 <br /> <br />April 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />