Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Mr. Boles said that the Citizen Involvement Committee found that Eugene was <br /> the only jurisdiction with a process for involving citizens, so it sent copies <br /> of its process to the other jurisdictions suggesting they might want to <br /> consider such a process. There has been no response. <br /> Mr. Boles suggested that the council approve the proposal with the following <br /> two constraints: Changing the name of the task force as suggested by Ms. <br /> Bascom in her memorandum, and with the understanding of all parties involved <br /> that this group has no charge to deal with modifications of the Master Plan. <br /> Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to approve the Lane <br /> County Commissioners' appointees to the Alton Baker Park Task <br /> Force with the two constraints cited above. Roll call vote. The <br /> motion passed, 5:3; Ms. Ehrman, Mr. MacDonald, and Mr. Nicholson <br /> opposed. <br /> III. WORK SESSION: EUGENE DECISIONS FINAL STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT <br /> Mayor Miller indicated that John O'Connor will facilitate the discussion in <br /> order for the council to more easily use Tony Mounts as a resource. <br /> The council continued its discussion and review from August 11 of components <br /> for inclusion in the final Eugene Decisions strategy. Mr. Boles said that the <br /> council officers had agreed to first go through the cost-setting exercise and <br /> then look at revenue sources to meet the funding balance. Enhancements and <br />e their attendant revenues would then be considered. He suggested that the <br /> council revisit those decisions after each step. <br /> Mr. MacDonald said that the revenue step (second) should not preclude any <br /> excess beyond what is required to fund the core from going to other appropri- <br /> ate enhancements. <br /> The council discussed Facilities Preservation. Mr. Mounts distributed a <br /> memorandum with updated figures. Mr. O'Connor gave an overview of the <br /> Facilities Preservation fund, saying that the $4.5 million is assumed in the <br /> $8 million shortfall. He said the figures represent an update from a 1990 <br /> Facility Condition Report. At that time, the report recommended 5 percent of <br /> the asset value be set aside for maintenance and repair. The percentage has <br /> been revised to 3 percent. The update also includes a replacement value of <br /> all the buildings, increasing the asset base to $86 million. Other issues <br /> dealt with in the update are deferred maintenance (recommending a five-year <br /> period to address these) and the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). In <br /> addition to these three areas, Facilities staff suggests that an amount be <br /> identified for system replacement and space reconfiguration. Staff also <br /> suggests funding be set aside for maintenance and repair of non-building <br /> facilities (2 percent of value). Mr. O'Connor said these recommendations <br /> amounted to about $4.6 million. He added that about $1.1 million (for <br /> deferred maintenance) would be phased out after five years. <br />e <br /> MINUTES--City Council Work Session August 12, 1992 Page 3 <br /> 11:30 a.m. <br /> . <br />