My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/10/1975 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1975
>
02/10/1975 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:36:12 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:09:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/10/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />(1659) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />(1730) <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />FF'Letter from C. W. Broughton, Scenic Signs of Oregon, protesting recent <br />increase in fees for sign district changes. <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/5/75 <br />File <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that Items A through FF, except <br />(see separate action above) be approved, affirmed, and filed as noted. <br />vote. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. <br /> <br />Item H <br />Rollcall <br /> <br />III - Ordinances <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 711 - Rezoning property north of Roosevelt Boulevard between <br />Lassen Street and Foch Street to RG-SR, read the first <br />time on January 27, 1975 and held lacking unanimous consent <br />for second reading, was read the second time by council bill number only, there <br />being no council member present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that findings supporting the rezoning as set <br />out in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of October 28, 1974 be adopted by <br />reference thereto, and the bill approved and given final passage. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley explained his vote against second reading was because of <br />inconsistency of the proposed zone with the 1990 Plan. He suggested a refine- <br />ment study and revision of the Plan for this particular area rather than rezoning <br />at this time. He felt if the Plan was in error it should be amended. Or if <br />the Council felt the area should be rezoned, he suggested adoption of findings <br />justifying a zone inconsistent with the plan because of the inability to <br />complete Highway 126, one of staff's bases for recommending the zone change. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray noted the substantial change in conditions in that area since <br />adoption of the General Plan. And Jim Saul, planner, said that findings attached <br />to this area in the 1990 Plan included its designation as an opportunity area based <br />upon the extension of the Roosevelt Freeway, so that the Plan recognized the <br />changes. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley however thought the Council would be in an embarrassing <br />position should Highway 126 be extended, bisecting this property and iSOlating <br />it. Mr. Saul said the originally projected route of Route 126 would affect the <br />most northerly portion of this property. However, if 126 was constructed it would <br />bisect a larger area, if Mr. Bradley was thinking in those terms. Manager referred <br />to memo distributed by LCOG about two weeks previously which he said would have no <br />effect on the merits of this rezoning. That memo referred only to timing of the <br />planning process, whether funds should be requested for an environmental impact <br />statement on Highway 126 at this time. Mr. Murray agreed that the LCOG note had <br />no intent to influence future rezoning in that area. Mr. Bradley repeated his <br />opinion that the Council would be faced with the issue that when zoning is incon- <br />sistent with the Plan, the Plan should be amended - and a policy to that effect <br />adopted. <br /> <br />Rollcall vote was taken on approval and final passage. Motion carried, <br />Council members Murray, Keller, Hamel, and Shirey voting aye; Councilman <br />Bradley voting no; Councilman Haws abstaining. The bill was declared passed <br />and numbered 17252. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 720 - Changing Sign District to Industrial on property <br />in the 400 and 500 blocks between Washington Street <br />and Lawrence Street, read the first time on January <br />27, 1975 and held, lacking unanimous consent for second reading, was <br />brought back and read the second time by council bill number and title only, <br /> <br />65 <br /> <br />2/10/75 - 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.