02/10/1975 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

there being no council member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. ~urray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that findings supporting the sign district change as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of December 3, 1974 be adopted by reference thereto; and that the bill be approved and given final passage. -- Councilman Bradley noted the State Highway Department letter opposing the sign district change on the basis that it would have an adverse effect onthe Washington/ Jefferson park. He also noted his earlier concurrence in the change to Industrial Sign District on the Scarlett property adjacent to that covered by this issue. He thought t9at change to Industrial Sign District was the result of an error on the part of the city years back and he didn't see that as applicable at this time. He felt this change would expand the Industrial Sign District too close to the freeway area and he was opposed to that. Councilmaq Murray agreed, saying he was reversing his previous posltlon. There seemed to be substantial investment in that park area, he said, and although he was no~ sure the sign code had much effect he thought it desirable' to accommodate the park areas as much as possible. Rollcall vote was taken on the motion for final approval. Motion was defeated, Council members Keller and Hamel voting aye; Council members Murray, Bradley, Haws and Shirey voting no. It was understood the issue would be taken to the next joint meeting of the Planning Commission and the Council. Council Bill No. 723 - Adding to City Code Sections 7.270 and 7.275 re: Alley assessments, read the first time on January 27, 1975 and held lacking unanimous consent for second reading, was read the second time by council bill number only, there being no council member. present requesting that it be read in full. - (1750) Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and given final passage. I' Manager explained that the city attorney had given the oplnlon that there would be' no legal problem because of assessing alley improvements on the basis of zoning, this in response to questions raised at the time this bill was introduced. Rollcall vote was taken on approval and final passage.. Motion carried, all council members present voting aye, and the bill was declared passed and numbered 17253. Council Bill No. 728 Amending City Code Sections 3.005, 3.010, 3~233, and 4.316 and repealing Section 3.237 re: Gambling license and table fees and wager limits was read the first time number and title only, there being no council member present it be read in full. by council bill requesting that Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. It Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All council members present voting aye, the bill was de- clared passed and numbered 17254. Co eo 2/10/75 - 24