Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />K. Capital Projects Prqposal - Copies of memo from traffic engineer and city engineer <br />(February 20, 1975) listing recommended capi tal projects tv'ere distributed to <br />Council members with the agenda. Also distributed were copies of street lighting <br />proposal for the central business district. Decrease in cost to the city for <br />installation of railroad crossin'g protection devices because of a shift in fund- <br />ing at the Federal level and a decrease in actual cost of some general fund <br />capital projects made available $125,000 in capital improvement money. Staff <br />recommended $80,000 of that for bike projects, and $45,000 for amortization of <br />street lighting in connection with proposed upgrading of some downtown peripheral <br />lighting between the central district and adjacent residential areas. . Manager <br />noted the general satisfaction with the high-level lighting in the central <br />business district but problems Iv'ith adjacent areas, especially for those parking <br />in the peripheral areas and walking to the business district after dark. He <br />explained the proposal for lowering the level of intensity of the lighting but <br />using high level poles for better diffusion and lower cost in amount of energy <br />used and fewer poles. There were negotiations with the Eugene Water & Electric <br />Board, he said, with regard to reimbursement to them for investment in existing <br />lighting, credit to be given the city for salvage value of poles, and credit to <br />be given if the poles were reused. <br /> <br />Councilman Hurray thOllght the street lighting would be inf luenccd by the com- <br />munity development program, especially w.ithin the boundaries of neighborhood <br />improvement areas. He thought decision should be postponed at least in those <br />areas tvhere street l.ighting could be co-ordinated wi th the development programs. <br />Manager noted that the neighborhood to the west of the central business district <br />would be the one most likely to be affected by the community development program. <br />Traffic F:ngineer had no "hang up" about. holding off on that particular area, but <br />he said he would like to have some direction from Council whether the concept <br />presented was appropriate. He said if the city was to continue authorizing in- <br />stallations based on present lighting standards, any policy change later would <br />force reimbursement to E~EB of costs not amortized when the change was made. <br />He cited l4th Avenue area as an example of the type of lighting proposed and its <br />favorable acceptance. <br /> <br />In response to Mayor Anderson, Traffic Engineer said if the Council decided to <br />adopt the lighting standards proposed there would be no problem with delaying <br />action on installation until decisions were made with regard to the community de~ <br />velopment program. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams said he was comfortable with the proposed lighting standards <br />as a pOlicy matter in view of satisfaction with the present type of lighting in <br />the downtown area. He said there was no question the high rise lights were more <br />efficient in use of energy and better from a public safety standpoint. <br /> <br />Traffic Engineer named areas of high- and low-rise lighting for Counciman Bradley. <br />He also designated areas having different lighting intens.ity. He said the light- <br />ing at the Willamette and Donald intersection was different from what was being <br />proposed here, that there had been objection to lighting at that intersection be- <br />cause it didn't give a good color. The present lighting on the mall and that <br />proposed here, he said, was the closest to normal daylight. <br /> <br />Councilman Haws said there were areas where there were no street lights, and with <br />a limited amount of money he wondered what the priorities were for installing <br />lights. Traffic Engineer explained the procedure for installation of street <br />lights and said that every intersection in the city for which a light had been <br />requested now was lighted. He said lights had not been installed at intersections <br />where a number of people living in the vicinity had objected. There is money <br />available in the normal budgeting process, he said, to take care of normal street <br />lighting requests throughout the year, that program would not be affected by this <br /> <br />3/24/75 - 11 <br /> <br />\4\. <br />