Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />said it would be difficult to restrict that tgpe of traffic on local streets be- <br />cause they were public rights-of-way and the heavy vehicles did have the right to <br />use them. Assistant Manager added that usually the issuance of a special permit <br />was for construction work in the downtown areas where there was no siginficant <br />disturbance to residential properties. He noted the necessity in some construction <br />projects for continuous "pouring" which required cement mixers to and from a site <br />for an extended period of time. <br /> <br />Mr. Hurray moved seconded by Hrs. Beal that staff prepare an appropriate <br />code change for Council consideration changing the permitted hours for <br />constructianto 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.; providing for issuance of construc- <br />tion permits during later hours if the public safety, health, comfort, <br />and welfare would not be disturbed by noise at either the construction <br />site or from vehicles traveling to and from the construction site; and <br />providing for a fee for such special construction permit. <br /> <br />Comm <br />4/23/75 <br />Approve <br />(See action <br />below) <br /> <br />Councilman Williams wondered if the restriction would preclude construction re- <br />quiring continuous pouring, but Hr. Hurray thought the special permi t feature <br />would cover that type of construction. <br /> <br />Councilman Keller was against further restriction. He.felt there was a multitude <br />of sources other than construction that MOuld produce discomforting noises at <br />one time or another, and he questioned whether staff should spend time on it. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Hotion defeated, Council <br />members Hurray, Beal, Haws, and Shirey voting ay~; Council members <br />Keller, WillialllS, Bradley, Hamel, and Hagor Anderson voting no. <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson iiJ-voting no said he fel t the present restrictions were satisfactory, <br />that there were so many different sources of noise that any attempted modification <br />of the existing ordinance might lead to even more restrictions later. <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />- <br />tr <br />Madge Lorwin, 550 East 15th Avenue, speaking for the West University Neighbors, asked <br />for reconSideration of committee action. She wanted the hours restricted to 7:00 a.m. <br />to 7:00 p.m. In making the request, Ms. Lorwin recognized the provision for do-it- <br />yourself type work to continue until 10:00 p.m. under certain conditions. However, <br />she said the neighborhood organization was requesting the restriction primarily to <br />stop heavy construction in the later hours. <br /> <br />An unidentified person said he was a studen teacher working at home during most of the <br />day and in the evenings. He noted that building contractors' claims regarding re- <br />strictions on construction hours in most cases were vague and contrary. He didn't <br />think limiting work to a l2-hour day would hamper anyone, especially since overtime <br />pay was necessary for longer priod of time. Also, citizens had no recourse when <br />disturbed by heavy construction noise after normal city working hours, there was no <br />one on duty to receive complaints. He said the neighborhood group would not be <br />against. extension of the hours if (1) evidence could be shown that the location of <br />such construction would not impair the comfort of nearby residents; (2) there was <br />evidence that residents within 250 feet of a project did not object to the later <br />working hours; (3) the permit was checked again after the project was started. The <br />main objections were to the large construction projects which created considerable <br />noise and were a nuisance factor, especially to teachers who had classes, graded <br />papers, .etc., during the evening hours. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved second by Mr. Haws to approve committee action (permitting <br />construction between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., and provide for construction <br />permits during later hours under certain conditions). <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley moved to table the issue and refer it to all.recognized neigh- <br />borhood associations for input. There was no second. <br /> <br />In making the motion to table Mr. Bradley said he felt the problem being addressed was <br />uniqu~ to the University area and did not represent problems in many other areas of <br />the C1ty which would be affected by the change. <br />2~2 4/28/75 - 27 <br />