Laserfiche WebLink
<br />K. Legislative Subcommittee Meeting - Ms. Beal said the legislative subcommittee <br />held a meeting and discussed jail standard bills and pending revenue bills. <br />The committee reaffirmed its statement on revenue bills, that .it supports any <br />bill which brings revenue to the city of Eugene. <br /> <br />L. Transient Room Tax Allocation Committee's Recommendation to Approve Lane County <br />Auditorium Association's Request for $32,500 <br />Ms. Catherine Lauris and other members of the LCAA committee were present at the <br />meeting to di~cuss the Auditorium Association's request for room tax funds, the <br />matter having been deferred from the last Committee meeting.. Ms: Lauris said <br />that the Association has asked the Room Tax Committee for $32,500, which is half <br />of the projected budget for the next 12 months. The Association's own funds will <br /> <br />be used in the same amount if needed. The funds are desired for the purpose of <br />hiring an executive assistant and preparing an informal booklet with which LCAA <br />can approach industries, foundations and the Federal government to request funds. <br />They also want to update and refine the plans of the architect and maintain <br />liaison with the city, County and the University of Oregon. They hope to have <br />a formal contractual arrangement with one or all of the local governments. In <br />addition, they anticipate getting 4-5 mi~lion dollars from nationwide sources. <br />Ms. r,auris pointed out that, for the last 4 years, $1,250,000 has been "reserved <br />for us" by the Federal government because this area is described as economically <br />distressed, and jobs could be provided if the project were to go. This would <br />be contingent upon a local match, which the Association has not been able to do. <br />Their long-range plan is to raise $1,000,000 or more from local sources. Figures <br />vary from $5.5 million to $8 million on the building. Innovations in construction <br />could reduce the cost somewhat. Two years ago the design was cut back by 38% <br />but inflation would give less building for the money. She pointed out, too, <br />that in the past the Council had made a strong endorsement of the auditorium as <br />a social and economic benefit. She also added it is not the Association's desire <br />to ask for major local taxpayer support. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray asked for a recap of the uses of the $32,500. He was told that the <br />$32,500, plus an even match by the Auditorium Association, would go for salaries, <br />rent and utilities, travel, architects fees, and supplies for a total budget <br />of $65,000. Projected costs for the second year would be $61,000 and $57,000 <br />the third year. $20,000 of the total $65,000 will go for architect fees to <br />update the auditorium plans. Mr. Murray asked what assumptions .would be made by <br />the Association of the City's willingness to provide room tax funds for a 3-year <br />period, if the funds were provided this year. Ms. Lauris answered that the <br />Association is taking it one year at a time. In answer to a question by <br />Mayor Anderson, it was clarified t}~t the Association's funds would be used <br />dollar for dollar with the room tax funds, as opposed to using room tax funds <br />first and then Association funds if needed. Mr. Haws said he was in favor of <br />the auditorium but concerned about the amount and the whole room tax allocation <br />procedure. He wanted to at least table the matter until a discussion could be <br />held in that regard. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seco,nded by Mr. Keller to approve the recommendation <br />of the $32,500 contribution to Lane County Auditorium Association. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray stated it has always been his position to favor the auditorium, and <br />room tax funds seem an appropriate means of financial aid. He felt the public <br />would not entertain another ballot measure for the project. He saw this method <br />of relying on private initiative as highly satisfactory. <br /> <br />Vote . was taken on the motion which carried, all Council members present <br />voting aye except Mr. Haws voting no. <br /> <br />5/27/75 <br /> <br />2..~1 <br /> <br />Comm <br />approve <br />5/21/75 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Comm <br />approve <br />.5/21/75 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />14 <br />