Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />K. R.ight-of-way Acquisition, 29th and fvillamette, authorization vIas requested on <br />property owned by Richard H. and Mary A. Oehler (l8-03-07-.Il-6900) - $445. <br />The proposed purchase price included cost of relocating five trees. <br />Corom <br />Mr. Hurray moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to approve the property 7/2/75 _ <br />acquisition as requested. Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br /> <br />L. Improvement Petitions <br />1. Paving, sanitary and storm sewers in Somerset H.ills III PlID - SB?; <br />2. Paving in Oakway PUD - 93.4% <br />3. Sanitary selver in area between 160 feet west of vli1lamette and ?earl Streets <br />and bet~veen 4th (3rd Avenue) and 225 feet north of 4th ilvenue - 86.1'i~ <br />4. S'anitary sewer on High~,-ay 99N from Side Street to 500 feet south - 44.:n <br />5. sanitary sewer on Lots 4, 5, 6, Block 5, Agate Plat (north of 27ti" south <br />of 26th, [vest of Agate, east of E'm,!cald) - 1009,; <br />6. Paving and sanitary sewer on Robin Street from Taney Street :.0 400~ teet. <br />east of Taney <br /> <br />Counci ll,'oman Beal inquired about the 44. 2~~ peti tion on the Highway 99N sewer. <br />Assistant Manager anslvered that the State was one of the major property o.mers <br />which would be assessed for this .improvement although that ownership was not <br />represented on the petition. Its inclusion would make the percentage con- <br />'d b h' h . Corom <br />s~ era ly ~g er. <br />7/2/75 <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Williams to approve the petitions. Approve <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />M. Zone change on area south of Kingsley Road between Goodpasture Island Road and <br />Willamette River - From County AGT to C-2 PD (Smith, Brown, !!m.,ell) (Z 72 51) <br />A renewal of the request to have this zone change application taken from the table <br />was submitted by Laurence Thorp, attorney for the applicants. Staff suggested <br />suspension of the rules to allow discussion before any action was considered ~ <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved seconded by Mr. vlilliams to suspend the rules. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley wondered if discussion was appropriate in view of current litiga- <br />tion on the subject property. He noted the attorney, Mr. Thorp, was not present, <br />and he (Bradley) was concerned objections would be raised if discussion took place <br />in the attorney's absence. Mr. B.radley also wondered if discussion at this time <br />would prejudice the Council's position. Assistant Manager said the discussion <br />was suggested partly because of the current li tigation, tha tit was an attempt <br />to get the issue "off dead center." Mayor Anderson added that the request l'las to <br />provide staff an opportunity to outline alternative actions, there would be no <br />public testimony nor was action to be taken. Stan Long, assistdnt cittJ attorney, <br />had no comment on whether discussion would be prejudicial to the Council's position. <br />He said Mr. Thorp filed for reconsideration and it was assumed he "vuld be present. <br />He noted that action today would be tentative, there would be opportunity for <br />Mr. Thorp to enter the discussion a t the next formal Counc.i1 meeting. Councill.,oman <br />Shirey sat., it as "filling the Council in" on the facts and that questions would <br />be directed to that end. <br /> <br />vote was taken on the motion to suspend the rules. Motion carried, <br />all. Council members present vot.ing aye, except Councilman Bradley <br />voting no. <br /> <br />Assistant Manager said the best solution now even with litigation in process ap- <br />peared to be referral to the Planning.Commission. That would require submission <br />of additional information by the petitioners to meet Fasano rules, but would bring <br />the issue back to the Council in a timely fashion. Referral would make the pro- <br />cedure less subject to challenge and provide for a substa,ntively better decision ~ <br />based on better information rather than a decision on the present record. ,., <br /> <br />Councilman Murray asked for a brief review of the request in relation to the broader <br />issue (Goodpasture Island overall general planning). He thought the prevailing <br />Coullc.il opinion so far was that hearing this one request outside considerat.ion <br /> <br />7/16/75 - 10 393 <br />