Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Keller to schedule public hearing Comm <br />- on the recommendation at the July 28, 1975 Council meeting. 7/9/75 <br /> Motion carried unanimously. ~~e action below <br /> Rick Cleveland, attorney representing a number of property owners in the Goodpasture <br />I-B-2 Island area, noted material submitted in support of particulars requested: (1) Post- <br /> ponement of consideration of the Plan amendment relating to the Goodpasture Island <br /> area for at least one month to provide opportunity for attorneys to prepare for public <br /> hearing; (2) questioning the need for 25 copies of material submitted; (3) ample time <br /> allowed for full public discussion even if it took more than one meeting; (4) adopt <br /> or reject at the public hearing the L&B recommendation relating to selection of a site <br /> for a third commercial center; (5) complete public hearing on all of the L&B recom- <br /> mendations prior to adoption of any; (6) review the two recommendations already <br /> adopted; (7) establish procedures for Plan amendment prior to public hearing on any <br /> Plan amendment relating to the Island; (8) time should be allowed for review of <br /> minutes of the MAPAC meeting where this issue was initially considered and for the <br /> Downtown Association and Chamber of Commerce to take positions. <br /> Assistant Manager noted that the documentation referred to by Mr. Cleveland had been <br /> received and the letter of transmittal reviewed. He said that many of the exhibits <br /> therein were public documentation already made available to the Council - General Plan, <br /> L&B report, etc. - and had been considered and deliberated prior to this time. <br /> Laurence Thorpe joined Mr. Cleveland in his concern about procedure utilized in con- <br /> sidering the Plan amendment. He thought that even if the issue did not come under the <br /> Fasano ruling, the petitioners should at least be offered the same safeguards. He <br /> said the city had delayed the matter for almost two years so it didn't seem inappro- <br />- priate to delay the issue another month to permit the applicants time to prepare for <br /> the public hearing. He asked that the hearing be postponed to the latter part of <br /> August and that written material not be required until the middle of August. <br /> Mike Farthing, 975 Oak Street, attorney representing owner of about 80 acres at the <br /> north end of the Island, joined with Attorneys Cleveland and Thorpe in requesting <br /> the delay. He also thought the applicants should be allowed time to review the L&B <br /> study and the portions adopted and used by the Commission in making its recommendations. <br /> He could see no reason for singling out the Island area, using procedures detrimental <br /> to property owners' interests there and somewhat in violation, he said, of their <br /> due rights. <br /> Assistant Manager noted that these items came to the Council in the normal routine of <br /> business, that there had been much public discussion and public hearing before the <br /> Planning Commission. He said he had discussed this item with Mr. Cleveland at some <br /> length and recognized that preparation for a hearing does take time. However, he said, <br /> this issue had not come up just overnight and staff has a difficult time recommending <br /> delay for any considerable length of time, there was ample knowledge of the issue to <br /> allow good testimony to be given on July 28. Assistant Manager added however that he <br /> thought written material should not be required until a date later than originally <br /> specified. He suggested submi-tal by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 22, to provide for <br /> distribution to the Council at its July 23 committee meeting so they would have ample <br /> opportunity to review it by the July 28 meeting. He said the entire problem of zone <br /> changes in the Goodpasture Island area had to be addressed and staff thought the <br /> July 28 meeting was a reasonable time for the public hearing. <br /> Councilman Hamel asked if all property owners in the Goodpasture Island area had re- <br />e ceived notice at Planning Commission meetings on this issue. Jim Saul, planner, <br /> answered that they were all invited to and attended a series of meetings with staff <br /> prior to the Commission hearings. All were notified of the Commission hearings and <br /> would also be notified in writing of the Council's scheduled hearing. <br /> 7/16/75 - 19 <br /> ~~ <br />