Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Councilwoman Beal thought any political activity was more educational than groups dis- <br /> cussing flower arranging, book reviews, manual training, etc. Also, that partisan <br /> political activity in this city was usually considered "dirty and ugly." She felt <br /> any city building should be open on the same basis as the county's Harris Hall and e <br /> that a separate category should be created for political meetings. Assistant Manager <br /> thought it would be a question of the fee charged. It was his understanding that <br /> Harris Hall could be rented to anyone for a fee. Mrs. Beal assumed use of city build- <br /> ings would be free for certain kinds of meetings. <br /> Councilman Haws asked for an estimate of a fee necessary to cover the cost of the <br /> building. There were no figures available and some question as to whether it would <br /> cover capital costs as well as operating costs. Mrs. Beal didn't see where costs <br /> would make any difference so long as it was city policy of extending use of the <br /> facilities. She suggested creation of another category to cover political groups <br /> with the cost borne by the city. She said that would be better than letting the <br /> facilities stand idle. - <br /> Councilman Keller wondered just how significant the problem was, how many requests <br /> were received from political groups for the community centers. Ernie Drapela, <br /> assistant parks director, said there was no problem with having facilities stand <br /> idle, they were used very heavily. Part of the problem was that the types of groups <br /> wanting to use the buildings, including parks department programs, couldn't be <br /> scheduled as often as they would like. He said the policy was not considered sacro- <br /> sanct, it could be amended, but there had been virtually no complaints since its <br /> adoption by either religious or political groups, and the parks department felt <br /> it was workable. <br /> Councilman Keller asked about the kind of scheduling problems that might arise after <br /> a building had been used a couple of hours for a political meeting then a second or <br /> third political party or candidate wanted to use a building. Mr. Drapela answered e <br /> that there could be no guarantees they would have the same time period say in the <br /> following week, use was on a stricly scheduled basis. However, the second, third, <br /> or other groups would not be treated any differently than the first, they would be <br /> scheduled as time and space permitted when the request came in. Councilman Murray <br /> stated that his concern was simply the implicit assumption that political participa- <br /> tion was considered a less appropriate use than other activities. <br /> Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Hamel to refer the policy on use of <br /> parks department facilities to the Joint Parks Committee for con- Comm <br /> sideration and recommendation with regard to nature of comments 8/27/75 <br /> made by himself and Councilwoman Beal in this discussion, and that Approve <br /> there be a clarification of the policy with regard to where political <br /> groups would fit into the classifications listed. <br /> Mayor Anderson questioned whether the Joint Parks Committee was the proper body to <br /> consider the policy, that they were primarily concerned with planning and finance <br /> rather than parks operations. Assistant Manager noted referral to that committee <br /> might get the issue into the political realm. He suggested an ad hoc committee of <br /> the Council rather than involving planning commission members on the Joint Parks <br /> Committee. Councilman Murray had no preference, although he was not too much in <br /> favor of creating new committees. <br /> Mr. Drapela suggested a meeting between those Council members concerned about the <br /> policy and parks department staff to explore a possible change in wording to clarify <br /> the different classifications. Mayor Anderson thought that the best route and sug- e <br /> gested that Council members Murray and Beal talk with the parks department and bring <br /> a report back to the Council. Councilman Murray thought it better to have someone <br /> more objective involved. Also, he would rather know what others thought so that if <br /> his and Mrs. Bea]'s thinking wasno~ that of the majority ~the matter would be settled. <br /> 9/8/75 - 6 49.4-, <br />