Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> If there was some merit in changing the policy, then changes could be recommended. <br /> He suggested that Council members Haws and Shirey be selected to discuss. the issue <br /> with the parks staff. Councilman Keller suggested a show of hands to determine whe- <br /> ther most of the Council really wanted some change in present policy, but it was de- <br /> cided a vote on the motion would determine that. <br /> e Vote was taken on the motion to refer the parks policy on use <br /> of its facilities and buildings to Council members Haws and <br /> Shirey (members of the Joints Parks Committee) for discussion <br /> with parks department staff. Motion carried - Council members <br /> Murray, Beal , Hamel, and Shirey voting aye. Council members <br /> Keller and Haws voting no. <br /> D. Proposal for Acquisition of Wayne Morse Ranch Property, Nature Conservancy - Copies of <br /> memo from city manager were previously distributed to Council members outlining a pro- <br /> posal from Nature Conservancy, a Portland based group, for acquisition of the Morse <br /> property on Crest Drive. Manager reviewed the proposal wherein Nature Conservancy <br /> would acquire the property upon receipt of a letter from the city indicating <br /> its interest in co-operating with other private and public groups in the purchase <br /> at true cost of acquisition by the Conservancy group. If the city fails to ob- <br /> tain the necessary funds, Nature Conservancy would have the right to dispose of <br /> the property after a reasonable length of time as it sees fit. The city would <br /> have to commit itself to maintenance of the property if acquired. Also, a re- <br /> quirement would be the placing of an appropriate plaque indicating the participa- <br /> tion of Nature Conservancy in acquisition of the property. <br /> Manager explained that the ci ty would have to finance appraisal if the sellers <br /> chose not to provide one. He estimated the cost at $1500 to $2000 for an appraisal, <br /> and because state funds would be involved in the purchase through the Bureau of <br /> Outdoor Recreation, two appraisals would be necessary - a commitment from the city <br /> e for an estimated $3,000 to $4,000. <br /> Councilwoman Shirey asked that it be made clear that the city itself would not be <br /> participating in purchase of the property. She said the city would be providing <br /> funds only for appraisals and in that way further the efforts of Nature Conservancy <br /> and other private interests in looking for grant funds to combine with funds pledged <br /> by the Legislature for purchase of the property. In response to Manager, Wal t Hani uk , <br /> parks land acquisition agent, said that the state would not participate in the cost <br /> of appraisal, that was considered a cost incidental to application for grant funds <br /> generally borne by the initiating agency. State funds could be used for acquisition <br /> only, he said. And he thought that the money pledged by the Legislature toward the <br /> property's purchase could be used as matching funds for any BOR grant. Manager added <br /> that Mr. Margolis, of Nature Conservancy, had indicated BOR money in addition to that <br /> normally allocated to Oregon grants was available for special type grants such as this. <br /> Councilman Keller said his objection to acquisition of this property by city, as be- <br /> fore,was because of the anticipated maintenance costs involved. He asked Council- <br /> woman Shirey what private funds had been raised for investment to provide an income <br /> for maintenance should the property be acquired. Mrs. Shirey said the funds gathered <br /> so far were nominal. However, no effort had been put forth to this time for funds <br /> for that purpose because there was a group of people in the process of incorporating <br /> for tax purposes before solicitation was actually started. Funds from that source <br /> would be used for purchase, maintenance, or whatever other expense might be incurred. <br /> She added that she thought when the city was handed a park without having to spend <br /> any money for its purchase, paying for its maintenance would not be out of line. <br /> e Councilman Keller aSked what the estimated maintenance costs were, how the property <br /> was intended to be used, and whether the road abutting the property was a city street. <br /> Assistant Manager answered that maintenance costs would range from $20,000 for <br /> maintenance of the property as it is now used to $100,000, depending upon the in- <br /> . <br /> 495 9/8/75 - 7 <br />