Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> It would seem to Mr. Murray that, even though Springfield may not be interested <br /> in addressing the issues at present, which would restrain efforts somewhat, <br />e "doing something is better than nothing". <br /> Mr. Keller questioned uses of potential federal funds, and Assistant Manager <br /> answered that money could provide fer one planner and/or possibly some legal <br /> research. <br /> Mrs. Shirey felt that, even with the problems, it would seem that.it would <br /> be easier to secure funds if the program is ongoing. <br /> Mayor Anderson commented that, even given the iimitations of lack of <br /> area-wide cooperation, he feels there is something Eugene can do alone in <br /> the area of controlled growth. If techniques and policies are devised, <br /> eventually those techniques should be satisfactory for others if they concur <br /> with the policies. He thinks the city could work through LCOG in an effort <br /> to get the policies adopted but that reconvening the task force is <br /> questionable, that staff has much more exposure to the matters to be <br /> addressed. The staff could present a series of proposals after which the <br /> Council could decide as a whole what would be most worthwhile pursuing. <br /> Mr. Keller left the meeting. <br /> Mr. Murray has no real reservations with that format but thinks any proposals <br /> would necessarily have to be based on the earlier objectives and points outlined <br /> by the committee. They are not precise but involved months of hassling to <br /> provide a starting point. <br /> Mr. Williams suggested staff study the issues and then ask the committee <br />e members to review it. <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to authorize staff to <br /> proceed with the preliminary work outlined and that those efforts <br /> be shared with the Planning Co~ssion and City Council members Corom <br /> who served on the community goals co~ttee, including an invitation 10/29/75 <br /> to M~ Niven, with subsequent recommendation to the City Council. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br /> D.l. Petition - Sanitary Sewer between 18th Avenue and 18th Place from <br /> approximately 70' East of Tyler Street to approximately 155' east of <br /> Tyler Street <br /> Petitioned by owners of 100% of property to be assessed. <br /> Comm <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to approve 10/29/75 <br /> the petition. Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br /> 2. Petition, sanitary sewer to serve north side of Whitbeck Boulevard between <br /> Powell Street and Lorane Highway <br /> Petitioned by owners of 42.5% of property to be assessed. <br /> Corom <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to accept the petition. 11/5/75 <br /> . Approve <br /> Councilwoman Shirey asked whether the sewer would serve existing residences on <br /> Whitbeck Boulevard or new construction. Don Allen, public works director answered <br />e that it was an extension of the existing system and would serve both exis~ing and <br /> new houses. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion to accept the petition. Motion carried <br /> unanimoUSly. <br /> S9G 11/10/75 - 15 <br />