Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> they were concerned with the idea that all commission members would be working <br /> on their own problems, and with the way members would be chosen. She encouraged <br /> the Council to contact the widest range of people possible in filling the member- <br />e ship and to inform neighborhood organizations of the openings available. <br /> Rosemary Batori, 2030 East 19th Avenue, read a letter in favor of the proposed <br /> ordinance and conveyed support of others in the community. She thought it im- <br /> portant for minority groups to have access to members in city government and for <br /> members of minority groups to have a part in the decisions. <br /> A representative of the Oregon Bureau of Labor, Civil Rights Division, saw problems <br /> with the ordinance as written. He said there was no mandatory requirement for <br /> co-operation in the complaint procedure - a complainant might not give informa- <br /> tion until subpoenaed, and there might not be evidence of reasonable cause if <br /> an attorney decided not to co-operate. He thought separation of the commissions <br /> would cause unnecessary burdens, saying people fitting all categories - age, <br /> minoritiy, sex, handicapped - would have to file compa1ints with each commission. <br /> He thought the bill needed much further study, that as it stands, funding problems <br /> would be created when beginning the complaint process. Staff would have no sub- <br /> poena power and would lack authority to obtain necessary evidence. Also, separate <br /> commissions would be a disadvantage to those who rea-Iy have been discriminated <br /> against. <br /> Martin Weideman, 2102 Delta, member of the Mayor's Committee on Limited Mobility~ <br /> said that committee did not oppose the concept so much as it did the structure. ' <br /> He said it was too complicated and could exclude from membership nonhandicapped, <br /> from whom support was needed. Also, he said he felt the committee should have been <br /> consulted when the proposal was drafted. <br />e Sallie Meek, 1045 Monroe Street, co-ordinator for Youth Planning Committee, was <br /> opposed to the proposed ordinance because a youth commission was not included. <br /> She said she fe1t the youth of the community had been ignored by the Council, <br /> adding that within the city structure, especially in the police department and <br /> schools, there was no channel for input from people under 18. The attitude of <br /> the city has reflected time and time again, she said, that young people are not <br /> responsible, not competent, not able to participate; Ms. Meek said a broad ad- <br /> vocacy group making recommendations to the Council and youth serving agencies on <br /> new plans, legislation, etc., affecting young people would fit very well into the <br /> proposed ordinance. She expressed concern about the way membership on the commis- <br /> sions would be chosen and suggested that people from the groups with which the <br /> commissions would be concerned should be consulted, that the Council itself should <br /> not have complete power to choose the members. <br /> Ron Sanete1, member of the Committee on Limited Mobility, agreed with the concept <br /> of a human rights council, but objected to the complaint procedure. He thought <br /> it would change the nature of the group concerned with rights of those with limited <br /> mobility, that it would question the involvement of people like himself (non- <br /> handicapped and an architect dealing with their problems) on a commission like this. <br /> He suggested that the existing Human Rights Commission be strengthened, that each <br /> of the minorities be represented on that Commission. At the present time, he said, <br /> the limited mobility group was not. <br /> Jim Williams, 2750 Capitol Drive, Lane County Mental Health Center, felt the youth <br /> of the community should have an explanation of why they were excluded. Young <br />e people involved in decisions affecting them, he said, would not feel alienated, <br /> would not develop delinquency characteristics. He said there was minimal access <br /> for young people to anything meaningful to them in this community, that they <br /> should have a role in the policy making. He added that there was no clear under- <br /> standing of what young people today were experienceing, that it was very much the <br /> responsibility of elected officials to make sure youth have access to legitimate <br /> roles in the decision making process: ~Z 11/10/75 - 7 <br />