01/12/1976 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- G.Appointments - Downtown Development Board - Mayor Anderson has recommended reappointment of the following members to the Downtown Development Board for 3-year terms commencing 1/1/76: Jack Boettcher, Harry Farrell, Dr. Robert Loomis / M~.urie Jacobs. All four have consented to reappointment. Mr. Murray moved seconded by HI. Keller to approve DDB members, .:I. recommended. Motion carried unanillOusly. Comm ,1/7/76 Approve H. Assessment Panel Report - January 5, 1976 Present: Council members Williams and Bradley; City En9ineer Bert Teiezel 1. C.B.981 - Levying assessments for sanitary and storm sewer within Mahalo Hills 1st Addition (75-6) No written protests or requests to be heard were received. Recommendation: Levy assessments as proposed. 2. C.B.982 - Levying assessments for paving, sanitary and storm sewers within Sleepy Hollow Addition; and sanitary sewer within 160 feet north and south of Sleepy Hollow A1:ldition; and storm sewer within Dapple Way Subdivision (75-8) No written protests or requests to be heard were received. 'Recommendation: Levy assessments as proposed. e 3. C.B.983 - Levying assessments for paving and pedestrian wag within Dap.ple Way Subdivision (75-16) No written protests or requests' to be heard were received. Recommendation: Levy assessments as proposed~, 4. C.B.984 - Levying assessments for paving and sanitary sewer on Sprin9IJoulevard .from North Shasta Loop to 500 feet southeast of North Shasta Loop; sanitary sewer to serve area between' North Shasta Loop and 50Q feet south of North Shasta Loop and between Spring Boulevard and 160 feet east of Spring'Boulevard (75-17) No written protests or requests to be heard were received. Recommendation: Levy assessments as proposed. s. C.B.985 - Levyin9 assessments for sanitary sewer along the south boundary of Senger Park between Norwood Street and Gilham Road (75-19) There were no requests ta be heard. Letters protesting the assessment were re- ceived from Boyd Lynn, 1422 Oakway Road, and Claude and Alta Hebert, 2153 Cal Young Road. Hr. Lynn requested "total abatement'. of the assessment on the basis that the sewer was of no benefi t to his property. He wrote tha t the property was already served and had been assessed for a sewer line on Cal Young Road. Bert Teitzel, city engineer, explained that assessment for the subject sewer would apply to property not previously assessed, the area at the rear of a deep lot that was within 160 feet of the line. The front end of the Lynn property to a 160-foot depth, he said, did have service and'had been assessed for a sewer line previously installed. He explained that the property could be developed, that it had not been assessed before for sewer service, and that there was no criteria on which to base a deferment. e The Heberts requested deferment of assessment against their land until it was de- veloped. Hr. Teitzel explained that they appeared to be eli9ible for deferment because of their age. He said an appHcation had been sent: to them along with information with regard to filing it for d~ferment of payments. Recomnienda ti on: Levy assessments as proposed wi th the understandin9 that assessment against the Hebert: propert~could be deferred upon application if eligibility was established. 1/1:2/76 -' 9 II !' ~ ~