Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10. Within Capricorn Estates Subdivision <br />(1219) . <br />, $3 331 40 San Lat ...$O.0105/SF..............0.....................O.. <br />1. Norm Green & Sons.................................. . 4' 0........................ . . <br />2. H & J Construction.................................$3.41 .5 <br />3. Eugene Sand & Gravel. 1nc..........................$3,692.20 <br />4. Shur-Way Contractors, 1nc..........................$3.B~~.20 <br />5. Kenneth R. Bostick Construction co.................$4.~93.~~ <br />6. L. D. Van Over..~..................................$4. . <br />7. Wildish Construction Company.......................$4,44~.:~ <br />8. Dan D. Allsup Contractor. 1nc............,.........$8.09 . <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />/ <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />5~~llTARY SHiER: <br /> <br />C0I1PLETION DATE: September 15. 1976 <br /> <br />-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------~ <br />------------------------------ <br /> <br />Don Allen, public works director, reviewed the bids, noting that on the second project - <br />paving Warren Avenue south of Kevington - a contract let in 1974 was cancelled because <br />the city was unable to acquire the necessary right-of-way. He said award was recom- <br />mended at this time. On the fifth project - paving and sewer in Western Industrial Park - <br />award was recommended subject to agreement with regard to the property owners' acceptance <br />of storm sewer costs. Mr. Allen said the award of contract on the eighth project - <br />paving, sewers, and pedestrian way in 1st Addition to Souza Park - was recommended on <br />the basic bid, the subdivider choosing the higher cost because excavation dirt would be <br />needed for fill material. On the ninth project - paving, sewers, and sidewalk for <br />Somerset Hills - Mr. Allen explained that work covered by Schedule B was on streets with- <br />in the planned unit development which could not be assessed by the city, and which work <br />was covered by a separate contract entered into by the subdivider. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened on Projects 2 through 10 only. <br /> <br />I-A-5 <br /> <br />Einar. Ronnding, owning profPerty adjoining the weshtern Industrial Subdivisdiond, sdaid he had 4It <br />not slgne the petition or the project, althoug his property was inclu e an the peti- <br />tion was represented as having been signed by owners of 100% of the property involved. <br />He objected very strenuously because of the amount of assessments already levied against <br />his property for other improvements in the area. He asked at least postponement of <br />the project until there was a chance to study the effect its costs would have on his owner- <br />ship. He maintained the portion of the cost assessed against his property in proportion <br />to the benefit derived would be inequitable. Mr. Allen said that only the portion of the <br />street adjacent to the petitioner's property could be paved, deleting the 320 feet - a <br />corner lot - in Mr. Ronning's ownership. Mr. Ronning approved that recommendation. <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented on <br />Projects 2 through 10. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved second by Mrs. Beal to award contracts on the low bid on each <br />of the projects as recommended - No.8 (Souza Park) going to Wildish on the <br />low basic bid; No. 9 (Somerset Hills) going to Wildish on Schedule A; and No.5 <br />(Western Industrial Park) awarded subject to agreement on property owner's <br />acceptance of storm sewer costs and deleting paving adjacent to Ronning lot. <br />Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all Council members-present voting aye. <br /> <br />Discussion turned to the Willamette Street improvement, Mr. Allen explaining that the <br />only change made after the previous public hearing was to eliminate the sidewalk on <br />the west side of the street. However, the cost ($5.80) would be assessed to proper- <br />ties abutting both sides, $2.90 per front foot. <br /> <br />1-8-1 <br /> <br />Councilman Murray wondered about the anticipated capacity of this street and for how <br />long in the future this roadway would be satisfactory under current development pat- <br />terns. Mr. Allen said the proposed design would suffice through the 1990 Plan pro- <br />jections, no more than two-lane traffic was anticipated through the year 2000. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5/10/76 - 6 <br /> <br />^'18 <br />