My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/20/1976 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1976
>
09/20/1976 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 11:38:52 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:19:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/20/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~ <br /> Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and <br /> given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present <br /> voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered ~7766. . <br />II-B-l II. Rezoning area at southeast corner of 29th and Willamette, from RG to C-2 SR <br /> (A&W Root Beer)(Z 76-20) <br /> The following council bill, read the first time on September 13, 1976 and <br /> held lacking unanimous consent for second reading at that time, is brought <br /> back for second reading and adoption of findings. <br /> C.B. 1234 - Rezoning to C-2 SR area at southeast corner of 29th <br /> Avenue and Willamette Street was read by council bill <br /> number and title only, there being no Council member <br /> present requesting it be read in full. <br /> Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the rezoning <br /> as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 26, 1976, <br /> be adopted by reference thereto, and that the bill be approved and given <br /> final passage. <br /> Mrs. Beal said a lady had called her saying the matter had not received <br /> enough attention and she wishes to speak. City Attorney noted that if <br /> Council wishes to reopen the matter, it will have to reopne the entire <br /> matter. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley that the hearing be reopened. <br /> Mrs. Beal felt the matter has rather serious implications on the whole 1990 e <br /> Plan. Also, she does not believe the people concerned about additional <br /> traffic have had an opportunity to voice their feelings. <br /> City Attorney noted that, if reopened, it would necessitate informing <br /> the applicant. Also, he said this is the first time he recalled Council <br /> asking to reopen a quasi-judical hearing. It must therefore be shown <br /> that there was some testimony not available at the time of the first <br /> hearing. <br /> With consent of the second, Mrs. Beal withdrew the motion. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion which failed, with Murray and Hamel <br /> voting aye; Haws, Bradley, Beal and Shirey voting nay, and Williams <br /> abstaining. <br /> e <br /> ~~~ Minutes 9/20/76 - 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.