My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/25/1976 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1976
>
10/25/1976 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 10:43:57 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:19:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/25/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />R.-Fire and Police Associations Request - Manager has received a memo from the <br />Fire and .Police Associations requesting that Council hear a matter going to the <br />Appeals Court on October 28. Staff has not had a chance to evaluate it as yet. <br />It was understood that space would be provided on the October 25 . <br />Council agenda at the end to discuss how to handle the matter regarding Comm <br />the constitutionality of public employees retirement law. 10/20/76 <br /> Affirm <br />Manager explained the resolution which had been prepared reaffirming the city's <br />participation in the Public Employes Retirement law in line with request from <br />police and fire unions. Copies of the resolution were handed to Council members. <br />He said the resolution had been reviewed by and was acceptable to the unions. <br />Councilwoman Beal saw it as an expression of support to other cities under home <br />rules and of the integrity of "our own" retirement program, <br />Randy Wight, president of the Patrolmen's Association, said he was also represent- <br />ing the opinion of the Firefighters Association on this issue. He explained that in <br />the last legislative session the public employes retirement law had been amended <br />to provide a retirement program for police and fire personnel equal to or better <br />than the stptewide system. Two home rule cities were challenging that requirement <br />and requesting that it be declared unconstitutional so they could provide retire- <br />ment systf'lIIs of their own. Mr. Wight said he personally would prefer dealing <br />more directly on the issue, but since the proposed resolution addresses the basic <br />needs. of the two unions, adoption was recommended. <br />S. Howe-Building Material Quality - Mrs. Shirey has had a request from a <br />Mr. Sparrow for Council discussion of the quality of building materials <br />presently going into homes. e <br />It was suggested and understood that Mr. Sparrow would contact <br />the City Manager with particulars so that appropriate staff might Comm <br />be present at a future scheduled Committee-of-the-Whole discussion. 10/13/76 <br /> File <br />T. Ridgeline Logging Operations - Regarding tree removal presently going on <br />in the ridgelinearea of the South Hills, Mrs. Shirey mentioned receiving <br />many questions from citizens that she feels should be answered. Parks Comm <br />Director will check into whether the operations are inside the city limits 10/13/76 <br />and if they are well controlled, and he will report back. File <br />U. Shade Oaks Water Extension Litigation - In answer to an inquiry from Mr. <br />Haws on the pending litigation, Manager responded that the Boundary <br />Commission has approved the extension. What the legal import is at this Comm <br />point is difficult to say since EWEB is the agency which would make the 10/13/76 <br />extension. He felt the City's action should be discussed by Council. An File <br />option would be to request EWEB not to make the extension. Too, the <br />written order from the Boundary Commission has not yet been received. <br />It was understood staff would report back to Council with possible <br />legal options once that order is received. <br />Shade Oaks Water Extension Suit - Assistant City Attorney Stan Long reported <br />that the order has been received from the Boundary Commission reaffirming <br />its previous decision to grant an extension of water to Shade Oaks and that <br />order has been served on EWEB, conditional on EWEB's approval. City Attorney . <br />advised,that the city can opt to: Do nothing; ask EWEB not to approve; or <br />return to court. If the city asks EWEB not to approve the extension, EWEB Comm <br />mayor may not honor the request as the present City Charter makes rights and 10/20/76 <br />responsibilities unclear and the new charter will not become effective until File <br />10/25/76 - 22 5~1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.