Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br /> ---- ------ <br /> Mrs. Beal moved, seconded by Mr. Harne 1 , to recommend <br /> approval of the change of ownership. Motion carried <br /> unanimously. e <br /> III. Proposed Changes in Amazon Neighbors Charter <br /> Revised Charter with changes underlined and the present charter <br /> were distributed to Council members. Approve <br /> Mrs. Beal moved, seconded by Mr. Harne 1 , to adopt a <br /> resolution approving the revised charter. Motion <br /> carried unanimously. <br /> IV.-Review With Council Members and Council Members-Elect <br /> A. A2Pointment of New Budget Committee Members--Manager noted that <br /> Budget Committee terms are expiring January 1, 1977, in Wards <br /> two, three, and seven; and a vacancy exists in Ward one for File <br /> balance of term ending January 1, 1978. Appointments are to be <br /> recommended by Council members serving in those wards fairly <br /> soon since staff wishes to schedule a preliminary discussion on <br /> fi scal situations in early December. <br /> Mr. Haws wondered if reappointment was necessary should a <br /> Budget Committee member move out of the ward from which ap- <br /> pointed. City Attorney will research the question and report <br /> back. <br /> B. Budget Meeting--It was understood that a Budget Committee <br /> meeting would be held December 2. A time for the meeting e <br />'-" will be set so as not to conflict with a meeting with Lane <br /> Transit District, also scheduled for that date. File <br /> C. Council Orientation Meeting--Before the end of the year, <br /> staff wishes to meet with the Council members-elect to discuss <br /> Council procedures and guidelines. December 16 was suggested File <br /> as a possible date for this meeting. <br /> V. ~evision of Resolution 2440 Re: Goodpasture Island Plan Amendment <br /> Memos, revised resolution with changes underlined, and Resolution <br /> 2440 have been distributed to Council. James Spickerman, acting <br /> city attorney, explained that the Council, by Resolution 2440, Approve <br /> amended Eugene's 1990 Plan and referred that amendment to Lane <br /> County and the City of Springfield for comment. Lane County <br /> subsequently took a "no comment" stance with the idea that it <br /> would go on to L-COG. The problem is that a state statute re- <br /> quires the County to hold at least one public hearing when an <br /> amendment to the comprehensive plan is considered by the Board of <br /> County Commissioners. It was therefore the court's determination <br /> that the city was trying to exercise jurisdiction outside its <br /> bounds. Mr. Spickerman suggests that the Council readopt the <br /> plan amendment by resolution and that it urge the Board of <br />"'-" e <br /> Minutes 11/22/76 -10 <br /> 5 toft, <br />