01/24/1977 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Comm 1/19/77 affirm Conun D. 1/19/77 affirm Conun Eo 1/19/77 file C. HCDC Appointment--HCDC has questioned whether to accept a Commission appointment made by Council because of the procedure used. Mr. Hamel wondered if HCDC had the authority to refuse. Assistant City Attorney, Stan Long, issued an opinion saying the appointment is valid and should not be questioned by HCDC. Minutes-Special Council Meeting January 12, 1977--Mr. Delay noted that a correction should be made to the minutes including Pam Mahler as first alternate and Sharon Gordon as second alternate to the Women's Commi ssion. e Lane County Commission Invitation--Mr. Delay relayed a message from Mr. Rust inviting members of Council to meet informally with the Commissioners. F. Assessment Panel Report-January 17, 1977 Present: Council members Williams and Delay, and City Engineer Teitzel A. C.B. 129!--Levying Assessments for paving Waite Street from Bell Avenue to Elmira Road (76-02--1203) Written protest was received from H. A. Sien of 641 Waite Street. Request to be heard was received from Les Wright of 662 Waite Street. Mr. Teitzel explained that the project was previously heard by the e Assessments Panel on December 6, 1976. He stated that the protests were centered around the direct charge for driveway replacement and concrete aprons. The property owners claimed they were lead to believe the $17.50 estimate included the driveway replacement and there would be no additional cost. He further stated that the Assess- ment Panel recommended the project be assessed as levied if the driveway replacement cost was heard on a taped recording of the Council meeting of April 12, 1976, and if not, the project be referred back to the Assessment Panel. Mr. Teitzel explained that in listening to the Council recording of April 12, 1976, the cost of driveway replacement was not read, and the only cost read was $17.50 per front foot for paving cost. Mr. Teitzel further emphasized the points in the attached memorandum to the City Manager, dated December 29, 1976, which was previously sent to the protestors of the assessment and to the Assessment Panel members. Mr. Teitzel stated it is the recom- mendation of the Public Works Department that the assessment be levied, deleting the 18 percent engineering and financing charge for the concrete apron and the driveway work, amounting to a total credit of $873.94, or approximately $0.21 per square foot of driveway area to each property owner. e 58. 1/24/77 - 22