02/28/1977 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,Jt Mr. Bradley then appealed to the Council to vote against annex- ation for the reasons already given. He felt it would not be a responsible decision to make at this time. III-B-7 Vote was taken on the original motion, which carried with Lieuallen, Hamel, Haws, Williams, and Qbie voting aye, Delay and Bradley voting no, and smith abstaining. III-B-8 D. Rezoning from County AGT Agriculture, Grazing, and Timber-raising Oi strict and County RA Surburban Residential Oi strict to Ci ty R-1 PO Si ngle-Family Residential Di strict (260 + - acres), M-1 PD Limited Industrial District (120 + - acres), and C-1 PD Neighbor- hood Commercial District (10 + - acres), all with Planned Unit Development Procedures (Cone/Breeden) (Z 77-2) r,1anager said Planning Commission at its February 1, 1977 meeting had unanimously recommended this rezoning, with the property being located north of Beltline Road, east of Coburg Road, including Tax Lots 101, 200, 300, 302, 1200, and 1201. Mr. Jim Bernhard, Planning Commission, stated that this request for rezoning with PUO attachments to control development of the property and to keep it in a land bank property for a feasible period of time was being requested by the Pl anning Commission. jt No ex parte contacts or reasons for conflicts of interest were declared by Council members, with the exception of Council person smith, who said she would abstain from discussion and voting on this issue. Pl anning Commission Staff Notes and minutes of February 1, 1977 were received as part of this record by ref- erence thereto. Pub1 ic Hearing was opened. Mr. Bradley moved to postpone to the March 14 Council meeting the issue of zoning. Mayor Keller indicated it was inappropriate for a motion to be made in the public hearing. Mr. Long, of the City Attorney's office, said the Chair could make a ruling and would stand unless Council members wished otherwise. Mr. Bradley moved to override the Mayor's decision. Motion died for lack of a second. . Thomas C. Moreland, 460 2nd Avenue East, testified as to the ration- ale for the location of the zones. The M-l zoning of 120 acres would be located at Belt1ine at its intersection with Coburg Road. He said it was felt this was the most desirable situation for the industry, and would offer buffer from the Beltline area. The C-1 zoning would be located at the intersection of Coburg and Crescent and would be a route anticipated for a residential development. R-1 zoning would be the balance of the area, with six acres ex- cluded for a park in the development. He indicated the M-l zone was needed for a suitable site for light, non-polluting diversified 2/28/77--17 \53~