Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to accept the Assessment <br />Panel Report. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Approve <br /> <br />II. Liquor License Applications <br /> <br />1. 1243 West 7th Avenue--Le Provencale Restaurant (new outlet, RMB) <br />R.J. Nicolai and G.S. Roddier <br />Schedule hearing February 24, 1977 <br /> <br />2. 1166 Highway 99 North--Allison Lanes, Inc. <br />Change of ownership from Fairfield Lanes--Arthur Wick, Jr. <br />Council approval only. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to approve the change <br />of ownership for Fairfield Lanes, and to schedule a hearing <br />for February 24 for Le Provencale Restaurant. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Approve <br /> <br />III. Improvement Petitions <br /> <br />1. Sanitary sewer 500 feet north of Lorane Highway from 100 feet <br />northwest of Whitbeck to 450 feet northeast of Whitbeck Boulevard; <br />totally within subdivision, no City costs. <br /> <br />.e <br /> <br />2. Sanitary sewer 300 feet east of Whitbeck from 450 feet north of <br />Lorane Highway to 260 feet north; totally within subdivision, no <br />City costs. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Ms. Smith to accept petitions. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Approve <br /> <br />IV. Annexation Hearings--Schedule for February 28, 1977 <br /> <br />1. Annexation to city parcel 1.25 acres located east of Spring Avenue <br />north of Central Boulevard (Lemke) (A 76-15) (map attached) <br /> <br />2. Annexation to city parcel 0.72 acres located along the north side <br />of Skyline Loop, east of Barber Drive (Rutledge) (A 76-16) (map attached) <br /> <br />Mr. Haws asked if the hearings could be set over for another meeting, <br />as he understood the Feburary 28 agenda was quite heavy. Manager re- <br />plied that the Planning Department is trying to have people appear <br />before the Council in the same order as they apply to Planning. These <br />applications have been in the process for a substantial period of time. <br />Mr. Saul, Planner, said that on the Rutledge annexation only the appli- <br />cant had given testimony. On the Lemke annexation, there had been a <br />concern over the fire access being adequate and the Commission had <br />voted in a 3-3 tie. Since that time, he had received information from <br />the Fire Department indicating that the fire access would be enhanced <br />if the area were annexed. He also cautioned the Council that the <br />Planning Commission does have a large volume of material coming before <br />the Council in the future. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />115 <br /> <br />2/28/77 --39 <br />