Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay commented on item No. 12, stating the Committee should be careful <br />in making conclusions in regard to this item. He said the City of Eugene <br />is in violation of secondary standards in this area and that they have <br />gone about as far as they can in restricting industrial pollutants in the <br />air. Mr. Farah indicated another contributing factor was the suspended <br />particulates coming from outside the area. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Delay indicated that, in the Phase 2 portion of the study, he would <br />like very much to have included the different rates of population growth <br />with some comparison of projected growth rate and costs associated with <br />the development of growth rates. Mr. Obie expressed a concern on the <br />private open space of 3,000 acres, which was alluded to in item No.5. <br />He was in favor of having private ownership of open space land rather <br />than public ownership and was concerned about the possibility of the <br />public eating away at the private open space. Mr. Farah indicated that <br />the 1990 Update Plan will speak to that issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley asked in regard to item No.1 whether LCOG statistics or City's <br />statistics were used in analyzing the great rate of growth as to its <br />accuracy. He asked what is the rate and is it accurate? Mr. Faran ;ndi~ <br />cated that item No.1 speaks in general to the rate of growth and it is <br />in the complete report which will be submitted to Council. Mr. Delay <br />and Mayor Keller both indicated that they felt there was a necessity <br />to have some cursory examination of the rate of growth impact. Mr. Porter <br />replied that he felt that would have to be done in the Metropolitan Update <br />Plan rather in the economic study which is being considered here and the <br />consultants and staff are looking at the entire metropolitan area, rather. <br />than just the Eugene area. <br /> <br />File <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley asked if the group was thinking about mini-management systems, <br />to which Mr. Porter replied that they hoped to have better management tools <br />for the future. Mr. Bradley said perhaps they could have a different popu- <br />lation rate distinctive from the metropolitan area, to which Mr. Porter <br />replied; "The Staff feels it has responsibility to provide services to the <br />entire metropolitan-urban area". Ms. Smith asked what the next steps in <br />the development of the plan would be, to which Mr. Farah replied; "Th at <br />a full report will be distributed to Council on Phase 1 while the Committee <br />is moving on to implement its study of Phase 2". Mr. Porter indicated th~t <br />the Study Committee had to have a factual basis to give to Phase 2 and they <br />are now giving the statistical conclusions drawn from Phase 1, in implement- <br />ing Phase 2 of the study. <br /> <br />IX. Resolution enabling participation in state price agreements <br />(resolution distributed to Council) <br /> <br />Manager indicated that the nature of this resolution would allow <br />the City to take advantage of any potentially beneficial mass- <br />purchasing sales that the State may arrive at. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to pass the reso- <br />lution. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Approve <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br />2/28/77--47 <br />