Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Transit District and a member of the Lane Council of Governments. <br /> <br />Mr. Dave Reinhard, Public Works Department, reviewed the environ- <br />mental impact statement and the process to date. He noted that <br />the request before the Council was for authorization of the <br />environmental impact statement to be completed and sent to the <br />federal and state authorities. Mr. Reinhard then proceeded with <br />a slide presentation in which he noted on the flow chart the <br />various steps which had been taken in reaching this public hearing <br />for the enviromenta1 impact statement. He said there was a need <br />for improvement in this intersection to alleviate the rush-hour <br />congestion. An opinion survey had been conducted, both for house- <br />holds in the area, automobiles passing through the area, noting <br />the results were in the report distributed to Council. He said <br />that 70 percent of those surveyed had favored the widening project <br />and there was no proposed major arterial for this area. Also the need <br />for the widening of this street intersection seemed to be the only <br />viable alternative to the major congestion problem in the area. One <br />alternative had been suggested, to stagger work hours, but no exten- <br />sive investigation had been made of this alternative, as the potential <br />would be limited. He noted that LCC and the University of Oregon were <br />the major employers for people passing through this intersection and <br />that their hours were quite scattered already because of the variety <br />of schedules. <br /> <br />Mr. Reinhard reviewed the environmental impact statement in which <br />the following issues were addressed: 1) traffic will increase in <br />the area, most from residential streets; 2) it is projected that <br />the air quality will improve, with the auto emission controls, and <br />the traffic flow will be somewhat smoother; 3) noise probably will <br />increase because of the traffic increase, but the traffic will <br />increase whether or not the improvement is undertaken; and 4) the <br />impact on the park land would be that 16,000 square feet of Amazon <br />would be taken out, but that 21,000 square feet would be put back <br />in with the closure of 29th Avenue, and there will be other de- <br />velopments in conjunction with the Parks Department in the area. <br />Mr. Reinhard concluded that the Public Works Department felt <br />the project was needed at this time. He noted the project is far from <br />being completed in specific design, that Council would have the option <br />on all the final details. He noted again that the project widening <br />was an attempt to alleviate congestion. He said there was some <br />sentiment against the improvement in the road widening, and that <br />Council would have to face the issue of either approving the projected <br />road widening, or take a look at the later use decisions of the area, <br />that growth in that southeast section of town will bring higher <br />traffic loads and more congestion in the intersection. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Sharon Posner, 2473 Columbia Street, spoke as a representative <br />of the League of Women Voters of Central Lane County. She noted <br /> <br />March 14, 1977--page 10 <br /> <br />~Ob <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br />