Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />II-A-2 <br />thru <br />111-^-lO <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Williams noted that in his business he had employed incarcer- <br />ated individuals and in each instance where it was unsatisfactory, <br />it was simply a matter of the person skipping town, that in the matter <br />of personal relationships with customers and working people the <br />individuals had worked very well. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to grant the appeal <br />denying the license by the Police Department and to issue <br />a license to Wilford Byrd. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley noted that, based on a lack information on an appli- <br />cation, similar arguments had been made and the Council had voted <br />against such appeals at recent meetings. He felt the issue was that the <br />Council should have some kind of consistency or some standards <br />with which to decide such issues. Mr. Haws felt the process was <br />the issue; that the applicant had been asked to fill out a form <br />and did not put down the correct information. He said the question <br />was should the Council grant the license not knowing what the <br />convictions and arrests were in this particular case. Mayor Keller <br />indicated he felt the question of process was involved, that to <br />override the Police Department would be taking away from their <br />authority. He indicated he felt no harm would be done in asking <br />the applicant to reapply, or that the Council should forget the <br />entire process. He stated that if the Council wants staff to do <br />its job, then it should follow through on the jOb that is done <br />by staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley questioned legal counsel as to whether a two-step process <br />could be involved: Council could allow granting the appeal at this <br />time and then grant the license at another time. Ms. Benjamin said <br />the Council would either have to grant or deny the license at this <br />time. Mr. Delay questioned whether there was a certain waiting period <br />for the applicant to reapply, to which Sergeant Smith replied there <br />was no certain time period . Mr. Haws noted there was a need for more <br />information on the arrests and convictions. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion which carried with Williams, <br />Delay, Obie, and Lieua1len voting aye; Haws, Hamel, and Bradley <br />voting no. <br /> <br />A short recess was taken. <br /> <br />E. 30th and Hilyard improvement--widening intersection: Recommended <br />by the Public Works Department; copies of materials previously <br />distributed to Council members. Manager noted the Public Works <br />Department had requested the public hearing before the Council <br />to consider this project and provide future direction for benefit <br />of the staff. <br /> <br />Don Allen, Public Works Department, reported the work session held <br />with the Council and Public Works Department, and the packet of <br />materials on the project that the Council had received to date. <br />He noted the Public Works Department was the proponent sponsor of the <br />project, and that Glen Clark of the State Highway Department was in <br />the audience to answer any questions as well as a member of the Lane <br /> <br />;2.05 <br /> <br />March 14, 1977--page 9 <br />