Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Com 3/30/77vr. <br />Pub Hrg <br /> <br />Com 3/30/ VII. <br />77 <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />Com 3/30/7?III. <br />File <br /> <br />CO./30177IX. <br />PUI Irg <br /> <br />Assessor. Mr. Lieuallen asked whether the cost would be absorbed by <br />the city or state, to which Mr. Mills-Erickson replied that the local <br />government would absorb the cost. <br /> <br />Manager noted this resolution would appear on the April 11 Council <br />agenda. <br /> <br />Gilham Road Paving Project, Beltline to Crescent <br />(Report, map, and design distributed to Council) <br /> <br />Don Allen, Public Works Department, noted the staff hearings had <br />been held and the project was at the point now where the first <br />public hearing should be held with authorization from the City <br />Council to go to final design, and the second public hearing would <br />be held to award the contract. He noted this was a Council-initiated <br />project, and that the Council had toured the area. In referring <br />to discussion held at the March 28 Council meeting regarding peti- <br />tions for improvements, Mr. Allen said that the City does not have <br />to have any petition for any improvements which the Eugene City <br />Council desires. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to schedule a public <br />hearing April 25, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Field Burning <br />Scott Lieuallen reported on the testimony he had given on the <br />hearings on the field burning bills at the State Legislature earlier <br />in the day. He noted there was some confusion over the past poli- <br />cies the city had taken, with the confusion arising out of whether <br />or not the machine field burning was a viable alternative and what <br />tools were available to measure pollution in the air. He noted <br />that the position he took was that the city supports the proposed <br />phase-down, the increase in fees for field burning acreage, and <br />the Field Sanitation C~mmittee as it is presently constituted. <br />He said the League of Women Voters had presented a very strong <br />testimony supporting the city's position. He noted that the <br />growers' bill could possibly be passed out of Committee, and the <br />future of the City's bill did not look too good. He said he had <br />been questioned regarding what the City of Eugene was doing to <br />try to avoid pollution in the air in Eugene and there will prob- <br />ably be pressure in the future to consider emission test legislation. <br /> <br />Other Matters <br />Manager noted the Legislative Subcommittee would be meeting Thursday, <br />March 31 at noon in the MCNutt Room; and the Room Tax Subcommittee <br />has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday, April 6 at 7:30 p.m. in the <br />Council Chambers. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams asked for City Attorney's opinions on clarifying a <br />conflict of interest in regard to the business affidavit report <br />which Council members have to submit. <br /> <br />Quasi-Judicial Hearings Scheduled April 25, 1977 <br />A. Appeals of denial by Planning Commission <br />1. Application hy Louise Nickels for zone change from RP-SR <br />to C-2, Tax Lot 1900--Assessor's Map 17-04-36-3 2 <br /> <br />:1.C} 8 <br /> <br />4/11/77 - 19 <br />