Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />Another concern was that the issue had gone on long enough, and <br />he felt that he did not want to support a delay. He said he <br />would consider an appropriation split of 75 percent for facilities, <br />12.5 percent for recreational and cultural services, and 12.5 <br />percent for tourism. <br /> <br />C.B. <br /> <br />1462--Relating to the transient room tax, creating a Subcommittee <br />of the City Budget Committee, and providing for procedures; <br />adding Sections 2.070,2.071,2.072, and 2.073 and declaring <br />an emergency was read by council bill number and title only, <br />there being no Council member present requesting that it <br />be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Williams, that C.B. 1462 be <br />read the second time by council bill number only, with unani- <br />mous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered <br />at this time. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith noted she was in favor of both the ordinance and the reso- <br />lution, stating that the members of the Subcommittee felt it was a very <br />appropriate way to expend the funds and the power of the Subcommittee <br />would be structured so that public hearings would be held in regard <br />to determining who would receive future room tax allocations. She <br />noted there was a built-in continued review by the Council. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Delay said he was against adopting the ordinance as he was <br />very concerned with the appointment process and felt it unfair <br />that the mayor shoul d make the appoi ntment to all subcommi ttees <br />of the Council. He noted that this Subcommittee was too important, <br />one which would be dealing with the distribution of public funds <br />and therefore was opposed to the ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen said he would feel more comfortable if the Budget <br />Committee made the appointments to its Subcommittee. He did not have <br />as much a problem with mayor appointing some of the boards and <br />commissions, but he did not like to see the mayor appoint members of <br />Budget Committee to a subcommittee of the same group. Mr. Bradley <br />concurred with Mr. Delay and Mr. Lieuallen. Mr. Hamel noted that he <br />could live with the mayor choosin9 the members of the Subcommittee, <br />noting that the mayor had been elected by the entire city, while the <br />City Council members were only elected by certain wards, and there- <br />fore he felt that the mayor had a broader appointment power. Ms. <br />Smith noted that this issue of appointment by mayor was an agenda item <br />scheduled for the work session and perhaps could be resolved at that <br />time, saying she felt it more important at this particular point to <br />pass the ordinance so that the Subcommittee could continue with its <br />work. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved to amend the motion to initiate the proposed <br />al ternate ordi nance whi ch woul d read "a room tax subcommitee <br />to remain in existence to July I". <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller noted that the work session probably would not solve <br />the problem of a very devisive Council. He noted that historically <br /> <br />33l(- <br /> <br />4/25/77 --17 <br />