Laserfiche WebLink
<br />F. C.B. l445--Levying assessments for sanitary sewer--between <br />38th Avenue and 39th Avenue (if extended east) from Onyx <br />Street to North Shasta Loop (76-46--1250) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />No written protests or request to be heard were received. <br /> <br />Recommendation: Levy assessments as proposed. <br /> <br />G. Appeal from February 24, 1977 Zoning Board of Appeals <br />decision in the matter of the variance request of Jack and <br />Anna Gilbert for property located at 3869 Marshall Avenue <br /> <br />Request to be heard was received from Bruce H. Anderson for <br />Mr. and Mrs. Jack Gilbert. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson did not appear at the meeting. Mr. Haxton stated that <br />due to a personnel change in the Building Division it was possible <br />that Mr. Anderson had not been notified of the meeting date. <br /> <br />Recommendation: That this matter be checked through the records <br />of the Building Division and if Mr. Anderson had received noti- <br />fication of the meeting that the decision of the Zoning Board <br />of Appeals be upheld, but that if notice had not been sent, then <br />the matter should be rescheduled for hearing at a later time. <br /> <br />H. Appeal from February 24, 1977 Zoning Board of Appeals decision <br />in the matter of the variance request of Mr. Thomas Connick for <br />property located at 1999 Kimberly Drive <br /> <br />Request to be heard was received from Mr. Thomas Connick of <br />1966 Kimberly Drive. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Connick did not appear at the,meeting. Mr. Haxton stated that <br />due to a personnel change in the Building Division it was possible <br />that Mr. Connick had not been notified of the meeting date. <br /> <br />Recommendation: That this matter be checked through the records of <br />the Building Division and if Mr. Connick had received notification <br />of the meeting that the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals <br />should be rescheduled for hearing at a later date. <br /> <br />Manager reviewed the Assessment Panel Report. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel to accept the report. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Don Allen, Director of Public Works, noted that there was an <br />error in notifying the two appeal items and the appeals would have <br />to be rescheduled for another meeting. In regard to the request <br />from Harold Daughters for Mr. and Mrs. James P. Johnson, Mr. Allen <br />said this was the second time the issue had come before the City <br />Council. Staff recommended the City Council to pass the assessment <br />as recommended by the Assessment Panel. The only other recourse <br />would be a civil lawsuit to rehear the assessment. Manager noted <br />it would require a two-thirds vote of a Council at the meeting <br />April 25 for the particular parties involved to be heard. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3~ <br /> <br />4/25/77 - 28 <br />