04/25/1977 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ie D. Rezonings 1. Located on the east side of Bertelsen Road North of 18th Avenue (Safley) (Z 77-1) from M-2 to RA Manager noted this recommendation had come from the Planning Commission's meeting of March 1, 1977. Gary Chenkin, Planning Department, said that the general plan for the area indicated there was a surplus of industrial property and that surplus should be reduced, that the property had since been developed at low density. He noted the property owner had requested a zone change from M-2 to R-2. The Planning Commission had recommended a zone change from M-2 to RA. He said this in- cluded 6.63 acres of vacant land. He noted James Bernhard, Planning Commission, was present to answer questions. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council members. Planning Commisison Staff Notes and minutes of March 1. 1977 were received as part of the record. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. C.B. 1458--Rezoning from M-2 to RA property located on the east side of Bertelsen Road, north of 18th Avenue was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Williams, that findings supporting the rezoning as set out in the Planning Commission's Staff Notes and minutes of March 1, 1977 be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be considered at this time. e Mr. Obie questioned staff as to how many units would be allowed to develop under the RA zoning. Mr. Chenkin replied 42 to 50 units, with most following the PUD procedures. Mr. Obie then questioned what controls staff would have in regard to the single-family dwellings adjacent to the area. Mr. Chenkin replied the construction would have to be consistent and compatible with the adjacent area. Mr. Bradley said the Planning Commission had recommended a modification of the sign district but it had not been included in the motion. Mr. Bradley moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to amend the motion to incorporate the sign district change from industrial district to residential district. Mr. Obie noted he wished to abstain from voting on the portion of the motion regarding the sign district, declaring a conflict of interest. e Mr. Bradley wondered if site review procedures should have been in- cluded. Mr. Chenkin and Mr. Bernhard replied there were sufficient controls. Mr. Bradley noted that on page 2 of the Planning Commission minutes Mr. Saul had stated that if site review had been included, it would carry a four units per acre classification, but would allow eight 3~o 4/25/77--3