Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Com 5/11/77 <br />A1)prove <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />VIII. <br /> <br />Mr. Saul continued that the basic policies included the following: <br />1) an urban level of development should only occur with the mini- <br />mum level of urban services as described in the 1990 Plan and with <br />a full range of urban services also defined in the 1990 Plan avail- <br />able; 2) that in the area west of Interstate 5 exclusive of Glenwood, <br />the City of Eugene is the logical provider of urban services; and <br />3) that the city limits will be extended through annexation in re- <br />sponse to need and as necessary to maintain the wellbeing of the <br />entire community. He then reviewed the criteria that had been <br />used by the city in the last five years when evaluating annexation <br />requests. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay noted the City was beginning to become more rigorous <br />in its outlook and the City's future in regard to annexation and <br />other policies. He said he felt that after another year had <br />passed, the Council should reexamine its policies to make sure <br />they are consistent with the future growth of the area. He ex- <br />pressed some general concerns in regard to the annexation <br />policies saying they were now very subjective and vague so that <br />people and the City Council did not know until it addressed a <br />specific request what criterion it was dealing with. He said it <br />did not address the cost trade-off and impact of growth, capital <br />costs involved, spheres of annexation, and urban and suburban de- <br />velopment. He felt it would be necessary for the Council to take <br />a closer look at the annexation policy, make refinements, and make <br />it more definitive. <br /> <br />Mr. Whitelaw concurred with Mr. Delay's perspective and said he felt <br />over the next year that Mr. Delay would see the policies becoming <br />clearer. Mr. Saul agreed with Mr. Delay's concerns noting that with <br />the economic reports coming in over the next year, the growth study, <br />and the update of the 1990 Plan, it would be appropriate for staff <br />and Council to look at these policies again to see how they might be <br />more refined and definitive. <br /> <br />Jim Johnston, Crest Drive Citizens Association, agreed with Mr. <br />Whitelaw's and Mr. Delay's comments. He felt it very important that <br />the Council continue to examine its annexation policy to make it more <br />definitive. <br /> <br />Senate B~~~ 5~~ealing with open meeti?f laws--Mr. Long noted he <br />had only recelved a copy of the bill at 1 : 30 and his 'review would <br />be very cursory. It is sponsored by the Oregon Newspapaer Publishers <br />Association and the hearing will be held Thursday, May 12 at 3 p.m. <br />He noted it would be important for City Council to take a position on <br />the bill so that staff could testify. He said the bill deals with <br />two kintilJ of /11(>,,1 in~e:--ft)"mt11 "",J i,nf,,"lttal. II .1cfi"oa a'j i"r....,hol <br />meeting as any discussion or activity between two or more members of <br />the same public body and goes on to delineate that minutes or memo- <br />rnnnllm of tho~p r1iR~llQRinnR Rhnlllrl h.. ttlknn Ann ..nt..rnd into th.. <br />formal minutes of any informal meeting regarding that particular <br />issue. <br /> <br />5/23/77 --11 <br /> <br />LfOb <br />