Laserfiche WebLink
<br />------- <br /> <br />Com 5/18/77 <br />Approve <br /> <br />Com 5/18/77 <br />File <br /> <br />He said a more definitive statement of a public body was included <br />in the bill, which would be any elected or appointed official. The <br />public body must meet in a public building open to the public and it <br />must occur within geographic boundaries of the public body. The no- <br />tice of public meetings would be changed "to provide and give actual <br />notice" whereas now the law states to provide and give notice. An- <br />other item in the bill included that news media could designate its <br />wishes to be notified of all meetings on a calendar basis, but Mr. <br />Long noted that this would not be a problem for Eugene as it already <br />complies. He said it also changes what must be kept in the minutes <br />by including the names of all persons in attendance at executive <br />sessions. He said the exception to the public meeting law provided <br />that hiring, dismissal, or disciplining of a. public officer would <br />be removed. The bill also would include that a written demand be <br />presented at a formal public meeting by a person for an executive <br />session to maintain confidentiality. In consultation with lawyers, <br />the bill provides that public officers may not consult in private <br />unless on filed litigation whereas now it's on current litigation. <br />It also provides that any labor negotiation or collective bargaining <br />would be open to the public. The bill provides for new enforcement <br />mechanisms, i.e., fines or even removal from office. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay questioned whether the definition of a public officer would <br />include Planning Commission members or any of the other committees of <br />the Council. Mr. Long said he thought so but that there were many <br />ambiguities in the bill that he had not yet studied. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to oppose SB 538 and <br />direct staff to so testify. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />May 18, 1977 Committee-of-the-Whole <br /> <br />I. Items from Hayor and Council <br />A. Skinner's Butte Property--Mr. Delay wondered how Council should <br />address the question of rezoning the remaining M-2 lot in the <br />Butte area. He asked if Planning staff should report back to <br />Council at next Committee-of-the-Whole meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to recommend <br />Planning Commission reconsideration for appropriate rezoning <br />of the lot in the south Skinner's Butte area. Motion carried <br />llnnntmolls1y. <br /> <br />B. Tri-Agency Animal Control--Mr. abie questioned Mr. Bradley about <br />the recent news media coverage of a spay-neuter clinic and the <br />possibility that the Tri-Agency Animal Control is not as respon- <br />sive to rural residents as the C01lnty has heen hefore Tri-Agenr.y <br />waR Corlllt!d. He liskE-Ii fir. lH,,,ll,,,y it lie Sl:IW i.Iil1L dt:; IJt:dll~ LfU.:. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />L-f07 <br /> <br />5/23/77--12 <br />