Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 4 <br />Leigh Iverson, 2869 Taylor, representative for Breeden Brothers, said they <br />had been working since November, 1976, with Public Works Department on . <br />this improvement. He said there were only three parties on the street who <br />were not in agreement with the petition. He said there were plans to <br />start construction immediately on the subdivision. However, the subdi- <br />vider would wait until the street is completed before any lots would be <br />so 1 d. .If the contractor were to have to wait until the street was improved <br />before starting the subdivision, it would be nine months, the project <br />would lose 68-70 jobs, and there might be a loss of $3/4 milliGn. He also <br />noted the need in the city for lower-income housing and cited the instance <br />of a Peppertree Subdivision which was to serve lower-income people for an <br />18-month period when, in fact, it was sold out in a four-month period. He <br />said this was the only land available in the Willakenzie area and it <br />was going to be developed for lower-income people. He said the subdivi- <br />sion could move ahead and would be ready by the time the street pavings <br />were to be done. He noted the Public Works staff had approached them and <br />asked them to spend $6,500 to purchase the right-of-way and felt this was <br />the first time, ever, a subdivider had been required to purchase a right-of- <br />way. He felt asking the developer to pay the administrative costs if the <br />exercise of eminent domain were used by the City was also a precedent. He <br />said no actual costs had been presented to the developer. <br />Mr. Bradley wondered if the subdivision were not to go in, if the improve- <br />ments would be made. Mr. Allen replied no, the staff would not initiate <br />them and the people in the area did not want them in at this time either. <br />Ms. Smith said it seemed there were some details which still needed to be <br />worked out between Public Works and the developer, and wondered if Council - <br />could still approve the petition at this time. Mayor Keller said that was <br />an al ternative. Mr. Williams felt it to be a logical alternative, as the <br />eminent domain question would come back to Council and at that time costs <br />could be considered and more information would be before Council. <br /> Mr. Obie moved, seconded .by Mr. Hamel, to approve the petition <br /> subject to the conditions as outlined. Motion carried with all <br /> Council members present voting aye except Mr. Bradley voting <br /> no. <br />VIII. Council Assistance--Memos distributed. <br />Mr. Williams stated his feeling for Council assistance was a need for an <br />improved briefing paper laying out the options and choices. He suggested <br />it include what Council was being asked to do, the options available, and <br />what it should do. <br />Mr. Williams left the meeting. <br />Manager directed Council's attention to memo dated August 31 and asked <br />them to discuss the outline and to develop criteria to meet the objec- <br />tives. He noted the memo distributed at this meeting goes into more <br />detai 1 . <br /> Minutes 9/7/77--10 e <br /> ~glf <br />