11/30/1977 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Mr. Lieuallen asked what an alternative outlet would be. Mr. Allen said the present project was to terminate in a slough, and consideration e was being given now as to whether to continue 1,500 fee~ further to the river. He said that would be use of these funds. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to award contract to low bidder, Wildish Construction Co. Mr. Bradley said he would vote against the motion, citing his con- tinuing opposition to the project, the rezoning and annexation of this property. Vote was taken on the motion, which carried with Haws, Smith, Williams, Obie, and Hamel voting aye; Lieuallen, Bradley, and Delay voting no. VI. Approval of Minutes Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr~ Hamel, to approve the Council minutes of November 23, 1977. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Quasi-Judicial Hearings Scheduled December 12, 1977 A. Change of zone/sign district, located in the 2200 block on the east side of Augusta Avenue (English) (Z 77-3) B. Appeal of Planning Commission denial for minor partition, located west of Shasta Loop on the west side of Barber Drive (Clark) (M 77-117) e VIII. Tri-Agency Policy Board Mr. Bradley reported the Policy Board had met at noon today and felt they resolved the issue, at least among the Policy Board, regarding Tri-Agency dog control. He said the decision was that Eugene and Lane County would, through an intergovernmental agreement, agree to operate a spay/neuter program, and would lease space from the Tri-Agency pound facility. The recommendation was that the Council authorize City Manager to prepare a resolution carrying out these actions. Also, the Policy Board was aSking in the resolution that the City of Eugene would enter into ownership and construction of the pound facility. Ms. Smith wondered what the outcome of the sundown clause was if the spay/neuter clinic was not financially supportive at the end of three years. Assistant Manager said it was felt not to be necessary because the City was confronted with budget allocations and either party to the partnership could indicate it could not afford to continue; thus the partnership could be dissolved. He said at the end of three years, the partnership would make a judgment as whether to dissolve, but that either could dissolve the partnership if budget problems arose before that time. Ms. Smith expressed desire that staff monitor the budget costs, and Assistant Manager assured her they would. . 11/70/77--9 ~7